A g Theorist on Why Kovacs and Conway's Process Overlap Theory Amplifies, Not Opposes,g Theory
Abstract
Kristof Kovacs and Andrew Conway (this issue) raise a question that g theorists have sought to answer since Spearman (1904) statistically demonstrated the existence of the general intelligence fact...
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The g loading of a subtest can be viewed as an index of its cognitive complexity; a subtest with a higher g-loading is more complex, which means it may be affected to a greater extent not only by biological factors, but also by cultural factors.
“At its core, the g loading of a subtest can be viewed as an index of its cognitive complexity (Flynn, 2013; see also Gottfredson, 2016): a subtest with a higher g-loading is more complex, which means it may be affected to a greater extent not only by biological factors, but also by cultural factors (see especially Dickens & Flynn, 2001;Kan et al., 2013).”
From No negative Flynn effect in France: Why variations of intelligence should not be assessed using tests based on cultural knowledge (2021) · cites this paper as Gottfredson, 2016
Cites
Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0160-2896(97)90014-3 · Cited by 1,408 · see citing works
Self-citationMainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0160-2896(97)90011-8 · Cited by 1,137 · see citing works
Self-citationGottfredson, L. S. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.174 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gonthier, C., Grégoire, J., & Besançon, M. (2021) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101512 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gottfredson, L. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Delaware (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gottfredson, Linda S.
- Venue
- Psychological Inquiry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-07-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 210-217
- ISSN
- 1047-840X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7965
- OpenAlex
- W2475428407
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Inquiry (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Education
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Keywords
- generalizability theory, intelligence structure, cognitive processes, factor structure of intelligence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
