The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement
Abstract
In higher educational institutes, developing classrooms for active learning is becoming a part of comprehensive educational drive for students involving and engaging in learning. For this purpose, influence of social factors on collaborative learning and engagement has been investigated which will influence learning performance of students. The study looked at following areas: (a) the ability of social factors for developing collaborative learning and engagement and (b) whether collaborative learning and engagement mediate a link between social factors and student’s learning performance. Constructivism theory has been utilized to observe the student’s learning behavior. Data have been collected through questionnaires from university students. Findings evaluated through structural equation modeling (SEM), shows that social factors, i.e. interaction with peers and teachers, social presence, and usage of social media positively impact active collaborative learning and student involvement, thus affecting their learning performance. The findings also provide evidence for double mediation used in this study. As online learning is becoming more prevalent in education, it has been concluded that overall collaborative learning and engagement with influence of social factors improve activities of students learning; therefore, their usage should be stimulated in teaching and learning in higher educational institutions as it influences students’ academic development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Pls-Sem: indeed a silver bullet
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202 · Cited by 21,631
An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6 · Cited by 8,088
Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research
Prince, M. (2004) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x · Cited by 7,334 · cited 3×
“According to Prince (2004), collaborative learning is the most valuable method of active learning.”
BackgroundInfluentialTenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005 · Cited by 6,312
O'fallon, W. M. (1973) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1973.10489095 · Cited by 6,289
Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669 · Cited by 6,233
A First Course in Factor Analysis
Price, B. (1993) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1993.10485363 · Cited by 3,512
Cited by
The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29 · Cited by 561
Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., Lim, W. M., Yang, X., & Khan, Q. R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29523 · Cited by 205
Rehman, N., Zhang, W., Mahmood, A., Fareed, M. Z., & Batool, S. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01914-5 · Cited by 97
Exploring learners’ experiences and perceptions of ChatGPT as a learning tool in higher education
Monib, W. K., Qazi, A., & Mahmud, M. M. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13065-4 · Cited by 80
Exploring the factors influencing the effectiveness of online learning: A study on college students
Kedia, P., & Mishra, L. (2023) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100559 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q.
- Venue
- Interactive Learning Environments
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-02-21
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2371-2391
- ISSN
- 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-5191
- OpenAlex
- W3132859330
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 134.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
- The paper
- Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.