A systematic review study on educational robotics and robots
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Atman Uslu et al. (2022) examined the use of educational robotics and robots in learning.
“a systematic review by Atman Uslu et. al. (2022) examined the use of educational robotics and robots in learning.”
From Trends and research foci of robotics-based STEM education: a systematic review from diverse angles based on the technology-based learning model (2023) · cites this paper as Atman Uslu et. al. (2022)
This finding contradicts Atman Uslu et al. (2022), who concluded that most studies in this domain did not refer to pedagogical approaches.
“This finding contradicts Atman Uslu et. al. (2022), who concluded that most of the studies in this domain did not refer to pedagogical approaches.”
From Trends and research foci of robotics-based STEM education: a systematic review from diverse angles based on the technology-based learning model (2023) · cites this paper as Atman Uslu et al., 2022
There is a wide gap among research participants between K-12 students and higher education students, including teachers.
“which found a wide gap among research participants between K-12 students and higher education students, including teachers.”
From Trends and research foci of robotics-based STEM education: a systematic review from diverse angles based on the technology-based learning model (2023) · cites this paper as Atman Uslu et al., 2022
Cites
A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics
Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019) · Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) · doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1223 · Cited by 419 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The integration of educational robotics in learning and teaching processes is important in supporting the education of students who do not show immediate interest in academic disciplines related to science or technology (Anwar et al., 2019).”
Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Where is the “theory” within the field of educational technology research?
Hew, K. F., Lan, M., Tang, Y., Jia, C., & Lo, C. K. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12770 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Lin, H.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2019) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1467462 · Cited by 159 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For this, the components in the technology learning model for fl ipped classrooms developed by Lin and Hwang (2019) were examined.”
BackgroundMethodRobotics applications grounded in learning theories on tertiary education: A systematic review
Spolaôr, N., & Benitti, F. B. V. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.001 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
The Role of Robotics Teams’ Collaboration Quality on Team Performance in a Robotics Tournament
Menekse, M., Higashi, R., Schunn, C. D., & Baehr, E. (2017) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20178 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The application of AI technologies in STEM education: a systematic review from 2011 to 2021
Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-022-00377-5 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Darmawansah, D., Hwang, G.-J., Chen, M.-R. A., & Liang, J.-C. (2023) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-023-00400-3 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“This finding contradicts Atman Uslu et. al.”
BackgroundResultInfluential
- Authors
- Atman Uslu, N., Yavuz, G. Ö., & Koçak Usluel, Y.
- Affiliations
- Computer Education and Instructional Technology Department, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Turkey
- Computer Education and Instructional Technology Department, Hacettepe University, Turkey
- Venue
- Interactive Learning Environments
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-01-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5874-5898
- ISSN
- 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-5191
- OpenAlex
- W4205693154
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Interactive Learning Environments (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Robotics and Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Keywords
- educational robotics, robot-assisted learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
