Cited by 89Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling Practices and SupervisionInnovations in Medical Education

The impact of psychotherapy training: Introduction to the special section

Helge Rønnestad, Michael, Ladany, Nicholas·2006·Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

Does psychotherapy training positively, negatively, or negligibly impact process and outcome of clinical practice? This fundamental question touches a deep core of meaning not only for students of ...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10503300600612241

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Helge Rønnestad, M., & Ladany, N.
Affiliations
Lehigh University (US)
Venue
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2006-05
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
261-267
ISSN
  • 1050-3307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4381
OpenAlex
W2004895847
Cited by
89
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
psychotherapy training, therapeutic process, psychotherapy outcome, clinical practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review