Cited by 100Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Development and Evaluation of ClientBot: Patient-Like Conversational Agent to Train Basic Counseling Skills

Open access
Tanana, Michael J, Soma, Christina S, Srikumar, Vivek, Atkins, David C, Imel, Zac E·2019·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Training therapists is both expensive and time-consuming. Degree-based training can require tens of thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours of expert instruction. Counseling skills practice often involves role-plays, standardized patients, or practice with real clients. Performance-based feedback is critical for skill development and expertise, but trainee therapists often receive minimal and subjective feedback, which is distal to their skill practice. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we developed and evaluated a patient-like neural conversational agent, which provides real-time feedback to trainees via chat-based interaction. METHODS: The text-based conversational agent was trained on an archive of 2354 psychotherapy transcripts and provided specific feedback on the use of basic interviewing and counseling skills (ie, open questions and reflections-summary statements of what a client has said). A total of 151 nontherapists were randomized to either (1) immediate feedback on their use of open questions and reflections during practice session with ClientBot or (2) initial education and encouragement on the skills. RESULTS: Participants in the ClientBot condition used 91% (21.4/11.2) more reflections during practice with feedback (P<.001) and 76% (14.1/8) more reflections after feedback was removed (P<.001) relative to the control group. The treatment group used more open questions during training but not after feedback was removed, suggesting that certain skills may not improve with performance-based feedback. Finally, after feedback was removed, the ClientBot group used 31% (32.5/24.7) more listening skills overall (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that practice and feedback can improve trainee use of basic counseling skills.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/12529

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [23]Miller WR Rollnick S Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change 2012 New York City Guilford Press
  2. [27]Jurafsky D Martin JH An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition Prentice Hall Series in Artificial Intelligence 2009 Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Prentice Hall, Pearson Educational International 1 1024
  3. [40]Collobert R Kavukcuoglu K Farabet C Torch7: A matlab-like environment for machine learning 2011 NIPS 2011 December 12-17, 2011 Granada, Spain 1 6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tanana, M. J., Soma, C. S., Srikumar, V., Atkins, D. C., & Imel, Z. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Tanana, Michael J
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2019-07-15
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
e12529
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2934582891
Cited by
100
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
chatbots, counseling skills training, performance feedback, therapist training, open problems, reflective listening, psychotherapy transcripts, chat-based interaction
MeSH terms
Proof of Concept Study, Deep Learning, Communication, Counseling, Humans, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review