Cited by 42Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesCounseling Practices and Supervision

The factor structure of the Working Alliance Inventory short-form in youth psychotherapy: an empirical investigation

Open access
Cirasola, Antonella, Midgley, Nick, Fonagy, Peter, Impact Consortium, Martin, Peter·2021·Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

Objective: The Working Alliance Inventory short form (WAI-S) is one of the most commonly used alliance measures with adolescents. Yet, its factor structure has received minimal attention in the youth alliance literature. This study investigated the factor structure of the WAI-S in psychotherapy for adolescent depression and explored its measurement invariance across time, therapeutic approaches and patients’ and therapists’ perspectives. The existence of method effects associated with the negatively worded items of the scale was also assessed.Method: The setting of this study is the IMPACT trial, a randomized controlled trial assessing the effects of three therapeutic interventions in the treatment of adolescent depression. The WAI-S was completed at 6, 12 and 36 weeks after randomization by 338 adolescents and 159 therapists. Data were analysed using confirmatory factor analysis.Results: The hypothesized Bond-Task-Goal alliance structure was not supported and a general, one-factor model was found to be more psychometrically valid. The existence of a method effect and measurement invariance across time and treatment arms were also found.Conclusions: While the distinction between the specific alliance dimensions is conceptually and clinically interesting, at an empirical level the alliance features of the WAI-S in youth psychotherapy remain strongly intercorrelated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10503307.2020.1765041

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Freud, A. (1946). The psycho-analytical treatment of children. Oxford: Imago Publishing Co. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1947-01846-000
  2. Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1994). The Working alliance : theory, research, and practice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(2), 223.
  3. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for survey nonresponse. New York: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cirasola, A., Midgley, N., Fonagy, P., Impact Consortium, & Martin, P.
Affiliations
Anna Freud Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Cirasola, Antonella
Venue
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2020-05-15
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
535-547
ISSN
  • 1050-3307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4381
OpenAlex
W3024334490
Cited by
42
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 6
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Health Technology Assessment
  • British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
therapeutic relationship, adolescents, adolescent depression, factor structure, measurement invariance, method effects, negatively worded items, therapist perspectives, psychotherapy outcome assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Existentialism, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Motivation, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review