Cited by 31

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The influence of extra-therapeutic social support on the association between therapeutic bond and treatment outcome

Zimmermann, Dirk, Wampold, Bruce E., Rubel, Julian A., Schwartz, Brian, Poster, Kaitlyn, Schilling, Viola N. L. S., Deisenhofer, Anne-Katharina, Hehlmann, Miriam I., Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín, Lutz, Wolfgang·2021·Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

Objective: Both good therapeutic bond as well as extra-therapeutic social support seem to enhance treatment outcomes. Some features of the therapeutic bond are similar to experiences in extra-therapeutic relationships (e.g., feelings of trust or belongingness). Patients with a lack of social support might benefit particularly from a good therapeutic bond, because a well-formed bond can partly substitute relationship needs. This study replicates former research (main effects of bond and social support) and investigates the hypothesized interaction between both constructs. Method: Data from 1206 adult patients receiving cognitive-behavioral outpatient therapy were analyzed. Patients rated early therapeutic bond, their impairment, as well as their social support. Multilevel regression analyses were applied to test for main effects and interactions between bond and social support predicting therapy outcome post treatment. Results: Consistent with prior research, both therapeutic bond and social support predicted therapy outcome. Among patients with high social support, the impact of the therapeutic bond was minimal, while patients with low social support benefited most from a good therapeutic bond. Conclusions: Results suggest that both the therapeutic bond and social support play a role in therapy outcomes and that good therapeutic bond quality might be especially important if a patient lacks social support.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10503307.2020.1847344

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Alexander L. B., 1986, The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook, 325
  2. Bassler M., 1995, Psychotherapeut, 40, 23
  3. Bates D., 2015, R Package Version, 1
  4. 10.1371/journal.pone.0218704 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/h0085885 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1177/1754073912451630 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1023/A:1009584915034 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/med:psych/9780195156843.001.0001 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.07.015 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1186/s12888-018-1697-8 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/cpp.503 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s10826-017-0797-2 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/10503307.2013.847985 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/ccp0000594 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1037/cou0000131 · DOI
  16. 10.2307/2136639 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s10902-017-9941-3 · DOI
  18. 10.1037/0033-3204.43.3.292 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb02208.x · DOI
  20. Hawkley, L., Wroblewski, K., Kaiser, T., Luhmann, M. & Schumm, L. P. (2019). Loneliness among NSHAP cohorts. doi:10.31234/osf.io/vx9nh. · DOI
  21. 10.1080/10640266.2018.1512302 · DOI
  22. 10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.561 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.4324/9780203852279 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1037/pst0000027 · DOI
  25. Lambert M. J., 2007, Clinical support tools manual-brief version-40
  26. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(199612)3:4<249::AID-CPP106>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  27. 10.1002/jclp.20800 · DOI
  28. Long J. D., 2012, Longitudinal data analysis for the behavioral sciences using R
  29. Lookatch S. J., 2019, Substance Use & Misuse, 1
  30. Lutz W., 2010, Lehrbuch Psychotherapie, 89
  31. 10.1037/cou0000376 · DOI
  32. 10.1055/s-0043-111083 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/16549716.2018.1445498 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/cpp.2441 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/10503307.2014.981682 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.003 · DOI
  37. 10.1037/a0014333 · DOI
  38. Soma C. S., 2019, Psychotherapy Research, 1
  39. Stekhoven D. J., 2013, Missforest: Nonparametric missing value imputation using random forest (version 1.4)
  40. 10.1026/0012-1924/a000034 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/j.brat.2015.08.006 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1007/978-0-387-93826-4_12 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/10503307.2018.1469802 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s00127-017-1446-1 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1037/cou0000405 · DOI
  46. Wilson C., 2010, Loneliness among older adults: A national survey of adults 45 +
  47. Wittchen H-U, 1997, SKID i. Strukturiertes Klinisches interview für DSM-IV. Achse I: Psychische Störungen
  48. 10.1111/jomf.12375 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/cpp.2336 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zimmermann, D., Wampold, B. E., Rubel, J. A., Schwartz, B., Poster, K., Schilling, V. N. L. S., Deisenhofer, A.-K., Hehlmann, M. I., Gómez Penedo, J. M., & Lutz, W.
Affiliations
  • Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany
  • Modum Bad Research Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Germany
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Venue
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2020-11-28
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
726-736
ISSN
  • 1050-3307
  • 1468-4381
Cited by
31
References
17
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review