Cited by 45Eating Disorders and BehaviorsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The impact of early symptom change and therapeutic alliance on treatment outcome in cognitive-behavioural therapy for eating disorders

Turner, Hannah, Bryant-Waugh, Rachel, Marshall, Emily·2015·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

The present study explored the impact of early symptom change (cognitive and behavioural) and the early therapeutic alliance on treatment outcome in cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for the eating disorders. Participants were 94 adults with diagnosed eating disorders who completed a course of CBT in an out-patient community eating disorders service in the UK. Patients completed a measure of eating disorder psychopathology at the start of treatment, following the 6th session and at the end of treatment. They also completed a measure of therapeutic alliance following the 6th session. Greater early reduction in dietary restraint and eating concerns, and smaller levels of change in shape concern, significantly predicted later reduction in global eating pathology. The early therapeutic alliance was strong across the three domains of tasks, goals and bond. Early symptom reduction was a stronger predictor of later reduction in eating pathology than early therapeutic alliance. The early therapeutic alliance did not mediate the relationship between early symptom reduction and later reduction in global eating pathology. Instead, greater early symptom reduction predicted a strong early therapeutic alliance. Early clinical change was the strongest predictor of treatment outcome and this also facilitated the development of a strong early alliance. Clinicians should be encouraged to deliver all aspects of evidence-based CBT, including behavioural change. The findings suggest that this will have a positive impact on both the early therapeutic alliance and later change in eating pathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2015.08.006

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turner, H., Bryant-Waugh, R., & Marshall, E.
Affiliations
Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Turner, Hannah
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
73
Pages
165-169
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1119862419
Cited by
45
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
eating disorders, cognitive behavioral therapy, therapeutic relationship, treatment outcomes, dietary restraint, eating concerns, shape concern, eating pathology, behavior change
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Professional-Patient Relations, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review