Cited by 127Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and PedagogyScience Education and Pedagogy

A Taxonomy for Categorizing Generalizations: Generalizing Actions and Reflection Generalizations

Ellis, Amy B.·2007·Journal of the Learning Sciences

Abstract

This article presents a cohesive, empirically grounded categorization system differentiating the types of generalizations students constructed when reasoning mathematically. The generalization taxonomy developed out of an empirical study conducted during a 3-week teaching experiment and a series of individual interviews. Qualitative analysis of data from teaching sessions with 7 seventh-graders and individual interviews with 7 eighth-graders resulted in a taxonomy that distinguishes between students' activity as they generalize, or generalizing actions, and students' final statements of generalization, or reflection generalizations. The three major generalizing action categories that emerged from analysis are (a) relating, in which one forms an association between two or more problems or objects, (b) searching, in which one repeats an action to locate an element of similarity, and (c) extending, in which one expands a pattern or relation into a more general structure. Reflection generalizations took the form of identifications or statements, definitions, and the influence of prior ideas or strategies. By locating generalization within the learner's viewpoint, the taxonomy moves beyond casting it as an activity at which students either fail or succeed to allow researchers to identify what students see as general, and how they engage in the act of generalizing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10508400701193705

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Davydov D. D., 1990, Soviet studies in mathematics education: Vol. 2. Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula
  2. English L., 1995, Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 17, 1
  3. Garcia-Cruz J., 1997, Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 289
  4. Harel G., 1991, For the Learning of Mathematics, 11, 38
  5. Mahwah
  6. Lappan G., 1998, Connected mathematics project
  7. Larson R., 2001, Algebra I
  8. Lobato J., Making the Connection: Research and Teaching in Undergraduate Mathematics
  9. Lobato J., 2000, Proceedings of the 22nd annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 371
  10. Orton A., 1994, Proceedings of the 18th international conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 407

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellis, A. B.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Ellis, Amy B.
Venue
Journal of the Learning Sciences
Published
2007-03-28
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
221-262
ISSN
  • 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7809
OpenAlex
W1996850046
Cited by
127
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
17.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Learning Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
mathematical generalization, mathematical reasoning, seventh grade students, eighth grade students, patterns, teaching experiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review