The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fish Swim, Rocks Sit, and Lungs Breathe: Expert-Novice Understanding of Complex Systems
Abstract
Understanding complex systems is fundamental to understanding science. The complexity of such systems makes them very difficult to understand because they are composed of multiple interrelated levels that interact in dynamic ways. The goal of this study was to understand how experts and novices differed in their understanding of two complex systems, the human respiratory system and an aquarium ecosystem. In particular, we examined how a representation of complex systems, Structure-Behavior-Function theory (SBF), might account for these differences. SBF is particularly relevant in understanding biological systems because an important domain principle is the relation between form, function, and mechanism. Our results demonstrated that there were minimal differences between the expert and novice groups on structures, but that the locus of the difference was on understanding causal behaviors and functions, the least salient elements of the systems. Mental model analysis provided largely convergent results. We also found differences between the two different kinds of experts in each domain. These results suggest that SBF does capture expert-novice differences and may have implications for instruction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust
Chi, M. T. H. (2005) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1 · Cited by 894
Cited by
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,154
Nonlinear learning underpinning pedagogy: Evidence, challenges, and implications
Chow, J. Y. (2013) · Quest · doi:10.1080/00336297.2013.807746 · Cited by 233
Systems learning with a conceptual representation: a quasi-experimental study
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Eberbach, C., & Sinha, S. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9392-y · Cited by 138
Self-citation(2011) · Cited by 123
Liu, S., Kang, L., Liu, Z., Fang, J., Yang, Z., Sun, J., Wang, M., & Hu, M. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1927115 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L.
- Venue
- Journal of the Learning Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-06-13
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 307-331
- ISSN
- 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7809
- OpenAlex
- W1976030211
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 63.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fish Swim, Rocks Sit, and Lungs Breathe: Expert-Novice Understanding of Complex Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10508400701413401
- The paper
- Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish Swim, Rocks Sit, and Lungs Breathe: Expert-Novice Understanding of Complex Systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701413401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.