Nonlinear learning underpinning pedagogy: Evidence, challenges, and implications
Abstract
This article provides a brief overview of the framework of nonlinear pedagogy and evidence emanating from motor learning literature that underpins a nonlinear pedagogical approach. In addition, challenges for nonlinear pedagogy and a discussion on how nonlinear pedagogy support the work of physical education (PE) teachers will be shared. Evidence from the increasing volume of work on nonlinear learning from motor learning literature is used to suggest how acquisition of movement skills is supported by nonlinearity. The emergence of goal-directed behaviors is a consequence of the performer, environmental, and task constraints. With a nonlinear pedagogy approach, the focus is on the individual learner where opportunities for meaningful actions can be learnt. Design principles based on representativeness, focus of attention, functional variability, manipulation of constraints, and ensuring relevant information-movement couplings can be delivered via pedagogical channels of instructions, practices, and feedback to the learners. Importantly, this focus on the individual sets the foundation for a developing nonlinear pedagogy framework to enhance teaching in PE although the challenges are non-trivial.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a need for individualized and varied pathways for learning.
“(2) the need for individualized and varied pathways for learning (e.g., Chow, 2013)”
From Skill Training Periodization in “Specialist” Sports Coaching—An Introduction of the “PoST” Framework for Skill Development (2019) · cites this paper as Chow, 2013
Cites
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210 · see citing works
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935 · see citing works
“Constraints on the development of coordination,”
Newell, K. M. (1986) · Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-4460-2_19 · Cited by 2,053 · see citing works
Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport
Pinder, R. A., Davids, K., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2011) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.33.1.146 · Cited by 692 · see citing works
A THEORY OF THE ACQUISITION OF SPEED-SKILL∗
CROSSMAN, E. R. F. W. (1959) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140135908930419 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
The Learning Advantages of an External Focus of Attention in Golf
Wulf, G., Lauterbach, B., & Toole, T. (1999) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1999.10608029 · Cited by 420 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…traditional (Blomqvist, Luhtanen, & Laakso, 2001), skill teaching versus mastery learning (Harrison et al., 1999), scaled versus adult size equipment (Farrow & Reid, 2010), analogy versus explicit instructions (Liao & Masters, 2001), external versus internal focus of attention (Wulf et al., 1999).”
BackgroundIncreased jump height and reduced EMG activity with an external focus
Wulf, G., Dufek, J. S., Lozano, L., & Pettigrew, C. (2010) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2009.11.008 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Why the constraints-led approach is not teaching games for understanding: a clarification
Renshaw, I., Araújo, D., Button, C., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Moy, B. (2016) · Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/17408989.2015.1095870 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Self-citationPrinciples of nonlinear pedagogy in sport practice
Correia, V., Carvalho, J., Araújo, D., Pereira, E., & Davids, K. (2019) · Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/17408989.2018.1552673 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Otte, F. W., Millar, S.-K., & Klatt, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2019.00061 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“…drive learning, it is the coaches that further facilitate the training environment by manipulating task constraints (e.g., field size, rules, equipment) and by driving feedback processes through instructional strategies of questioning and guided discovery (Chow, 2013; Renshaw et al., 2016).”
Background
- Authors
- Chow, J. Y.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Chow, Jia Yi
- ORCID
- Chow, Jia Yi
- Venue
- Quest
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 469-484
- ISSN
- 0033-6297 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2750
- OpenAlex
- W2005811227
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Quest (publishedVersion)
- NIE Digital Repository (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Keywords
- nonlinear pedagogy, non-linear learning, motor learning, physical education teaching, goal-directed behavior, representativeness, attentional focus, functional variation, constraint manipulation, feedback, personalized learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review