Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Physical Models to Biomechanics: A Design-Based Modeling Approach

Penner, David E., Lehrer, Richard, Schauble, Leona·1998·Journal of the Learning Sciences

Abstract

In this study, we used a design context for developing children's understanding of the natural world via the designing, building, testing, and evaluation of models. In this instance, we asked children to design models of the human elbow. Children's models were then used as the basis for an exploration of the biomechanics of the human arm. The investigation of biomechanical principles is a major extension of our earlier research. By building on children's design-based models, we were able to engage students in an investigation of the relation between force and the location of the attachment point of the biceps. In so doing, we were able to provide children with opportunities to develop their understanding of the relations between mathematics and science through the construction and interpretation of data tables and graphs. Design is a form of problem solving in which thinking, tool manipulation, and materials are reflected in the construction of an artifact (Bucciarelli, 1994; Roth, 1996; Simon, 1981). In turn, artifacts become objects that facilitate the sharing of knowledge. Moreover, because many design problems are, at least initially, inherently unspecified, the problem solver must often first define the problem and then explicitly state and justify the relation between the problem and the proposed solution. This promotes a view of knowledge as purposeful, fluid, and conditional (Lehrer, 1993). In this study, we used a design context for developing children's understanding of the natural world via the designing, building, testing, and evaluation of models. We chose a design focus because the process of design affords the potential for children to construct, apply, debate, and evaluate models, rather than to simply

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10508406.1998.9672060

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L.
Venue
Journal of the Learning Sciences
Published
1998-07
Volume
7
Issue
3-4
Pages
429-449
ISSN
  • 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7809
OpenAlex
W2010705280
Cited by
165
References
2
FWCI
19.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Physical Models to Biomechanics: A Design-Based Modeling Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672060
The paper
Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From Physical Models to Biomechanics: A Design-Based Modeling Approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672060

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.