The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Physical Models to Biomechanics: A Design-Based Modeling Approach
Abstract
In this study, we used a design context for developing children's understanding of the natural world via the designing, building, testing, and evaluation of models. In this instance, we asked children to design models of the human elbow. Children's models were then used as the basis for an exploration of the biomechanics of the human arm. The investigation of biomechanical principles is a major extension of our earlier research. By building on children's design-based models, we were able to engage students in an investigation of the relation between force and the location of the attachment point of the biceps. In so doing, we were able to provide children with opportunities to develop their understanding of the relations between mathematics and science through the construction and interpretation of data tables and graphs. Design is a form of problem solving in which thinking, tool manipulation, and materials are reflected in the construction of an artifact (Bucciarelli, 1994; Roth, 1996; Simon, 1981). In turn, artifacts become objects that facilitate the sharing of knowledge. Moreover, because many design problems are, at least initially, inherently unspecified, the problem solver must often first define the problem and then explicitly state and justify the relation between the problem and the proposed solution. This promotes a view of knowledge as purposeful, fluid, and conditional (Lehrer, 1993). In this study, we used a design context for developing children's understanding of the natural world via the designing, building, testing, and evaluation of models. We chose a design focus because the process of design affords the potential for children to construct, apply, debate, and evaluate models, rather than to simply
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Children and adults as intuitive scientists.
Kuhn, D. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.674 · Cited by 774
Lynch, M. (1988) · Human Studies · doi:10.1007/bf00177304 · Cited by 435
Cited by
The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10106 · Cited by 2,699
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,154
Advancing engineering education in P–12 classrooms
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x · Cited by 910
Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry
Sandoval, W. A. (2005) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20065 · Cited by 769
Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-012-9240-x · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L.
- Venue
- Journal of the Learning Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 429-449
- ISSN
- 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7809
- OpenAlex
- W2010705280
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Physical Models to Biomechanics: A Design-Based Modeling Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672060
- The paper
- Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From Physical Models to Biomechanics: A Design-Based Modeling Approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.