Cited by 7Child Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Sexually Abused Adolescents

Tocker, Lotem, Ben-Amitay, Galit, Horesh-Reinman, Netta, Lask, Michal, Toren, Paz·2017·Journal of Child Sexual Abuse

Abstract

This cross-sectional, case control study examines the association between child sexual abuse and interpersonal and intrapersonal outcomes among 54 adolescents, examining specific clinical measures (depression, anxiety, dissociation, and posttraumatic stress disorder, attachment patterns, self-esteem, self-disclosure, and family environment characteristics). The research results point to a correlation between sexual abuse and higher levels of the clinical measures. In addition, a correlation was found between sexual abuse and level of avoidant attachment, self-esteem, and family environment characteristics. Stepwise hierarchical regressions were conducted to examine how adolescent attributes predicted depression, anxiety, and dissociation beyond the prediction based on sexual abuse. A combination of self-esteem, anxiety attachment, and family cohesiveness made sexual abuse insignificant when predicting levels of depression, anxiety, and dissociation. This study contributes to characterizing the emotional, personal, and family attributes of adolescents who experienced sexual abuse. It also raises questions about the clinical outcomes usually associated with sexual abuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10538712.2017.1300204

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tocker, L., Ben-Amitay, G., Horesh-Reinman, N., Lask, M., & Toren, P.
Affiliations
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Department of Clinical Psychology, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Tocker, Lotem
Venue
Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
Published
2017-05-19
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
487-505
ISSN
  • 1053-8712 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0679
OpenAlex
W2619796697
Cited by
7
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, adolescents, depression, anxiety, dissociation, post-traumatic stress disorder, attachment patterns, attachment avoidance, self-esteem, self-disclosure, family cohesion, family environment, clinical outcome predictors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Child Abuse, Sexual, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Family, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Object Attachment, Self Concept, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review