The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effect of Cannabis Compared with Alcohol on Driving
Open accessAbstract
The prevalence of both alcohol and cannabis use and the high morbidity associated with motor vehicle crashes has lead to a plethora of research on the link between the two. Drunk drivers are involved in 25% of motor vehicle fatalities, and many accidents involve drivers who test positive for cannabis. Cannabis and alcohol acutely impair several driving‐related skills in a dose‐related fashion, but the effects of cannabis vary more between individuals than they do with alcohol because of tolerance, differences in smoking technique, and different absorptions of Δ 9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient in marijuana. Detrimental effects of cannabis use vary in a dose‐related fashion, and are more pronounced with highly automatic driving functions than with more complex tasks that require conscious control, whereas alcohol produces an opposite pattern of impairment. Because of both this and an increased awareness that they are impaired, marijuana smokers tend to compensate effectively while driving by utilizing a variety of behavioral strategies. Combining marijuana with alcohol eliminates the ability to use such strategies effectively, however, and results in impairment even at doses which would be insignificant were they of either drug alone. Epidemiological studies have been inconclusive regarding whether cannabis use causes an increased risk of accidents; in contrast, unanimity exists that alcohol use increases crash risk. Furthermore, the risk from driving under the influence of both alcohol and cannabis is greater than the risk of driving under the influence of either alone. Future research should focus on resolving contradictions posed by previous studies, and patients who smoke cannabis should be counseled to wait several hours before driving, and avoid combining the two drugs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wagner, F. (2002) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(01)00367-0 · Cited by 739
Cited by
Medical Marijuana Laws, Traffic Fatalities, and Alcohol Consumption
Mark Anderson, D., Hansen, B., & Rees, D. I. (2013) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/668812 · Cited by 409
Positive and Negative Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids on Health
Cohen, K., Weizman, A., & Weinstein, A. (2019) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.1381 · Cited by 255
Haroutounian, S., Ratz, Y., Ginosar, Y., Furmanov, K., Saifi, F., Meidan, R., & Davidson, E. (2016) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000364 · Cited by 234
Chiu, V., Leung, J., Hall, W., Stjepanović, D., & Degenhardt, L. (2021) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108610 · Cited by 92
Pearlson, G. D., Stevens, M. C., & D'Souza, D. C. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.689444 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Sewell, R. A., Poling, J., & Sofuoglu, M.
- Venue
- The American Journal on Addictions
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-193
- ISSN
- 1055-0496 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0391
- OpenAlex
- W2138472788
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Cannabis Compared with Alcohol on Driving. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10550490902786934
- The paper
- Sewell, R. A., Poling, J., & Sofuoglu, M. (2009). The Effect of Cannabis Compared with Alcohol on Driving. The American Journal on Addictions. https://doi.org/10.1080/10550490902786934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.