Cited by 92Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentPain Management and Opioid UseSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

A Preliminary Study Comparing Methadone and Buprenorphine in Patients with Chronic Pain and Coexistent Opioid Addiction

Open access
Neumann, Anne M., Blondell, Richard D., Jaanimägi, Urmo, Giambrone, Amanda K., Homish, Gregory G., Lozano, Jacqueline R., Kowalik, Urszula, Azadfard, Mohammadreza·2013·Journal of Addictive Diseases

Abstract

Patients with opioid addiction who receive prescription opioids for treatment of nonmalignant chronic pain present a therapeutic challenge. Fifty-four participants with chronic pain and opioid addiction were randomized to receive methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone. At the 6-month follow-up examination, 26 (48.1%) participants who remained in the study noted a 12.75% reduction in pain (P = 0.043), and no participants in the methadone group compared to 5 in the buprenorphine group reported illicit opioid use (P = 0.039). Other differences between the two conditions were not found. Long-term, low-dose methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone treatment produced analgesia in participants with chronic pain and opioid addiction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10550887.2012.759872

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 28 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Across both treatment groups, participants reported significantly less pain at six months than at the initial visit, with a 12.75% reduction in pain (P = 0.043).

    “Across both treatment condition, participants reported significantly less pain at 6 months (M = 5.5, SD = 1.9) than at the initial visit (M = 6.3, SD = 1.2) with a 12.75% reduction in pain at medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.52).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Only 21 participants reported using opiates at the initial visit, despite all having a diagnosis of opioid dependence.

    “Although all patients in this study had a diagnosis of opioid dependence, only 21 reported the use of opiates at the initial visit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Treatment retention at six months did not differ significantly between the methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone groups.

    “Twenty-six (48.2%) participants completed the treatment at 6 months, 13 in each treatment condition. Therefore, treatment retention did not significantly differ between the two treatments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone groups did not differ significantly in percent change in functioning from baseline at six months.

    “There were no significant differences. No significant differences were found in percent change in functioning from baseline (Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In patients with chronic pain and co-existent opioid addiction, six months of continuous treatment with either buprenorphine/naloxone or methadone produced analgesia.

    “Both 6-month continuous buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone treatment resulted in analgesia.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 11
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 8
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Alcohol use, cocaine use, and other illicit drug use did not differ between the two treatment conditions in this study.

    “In the present study, alcohol use, cocaine use, and other illicit drug use did not differ between the two treatment conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At six months, five participants in the buprenorphine/naloxone group reported opioid use, whereas none in the methadone group did, and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.039).

    “At 6 months, 5 participants in the buprenorphine/naloxone group reported the use of opioids compared to none of the participants in the methadone group (Table 3); this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.039).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants were randomized into two groups using a pre-determined 3:3 ratio block randomization procedure by drawing lots.

    “After informed consent was obtained, participants were randomized into one of two groups that were pre-determined by drawing lots using a 3:3 ratio, block randomization procedure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study was not double-blind and not double-dummy.

    “This is a preliminary study with a small convenience sample of treatment-seeking individuals and high drop-out rate that was not a double-blind and double-dummy study.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study was an open-label trial without a placebo and without a control group.

    “This was an open-label trial without a placebo and a control group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The trial was open-label.

    “In this open-label trial, the remaining 54 participants with chronic pain and opioid addiction were randomly assigned to one of two 6-month treatment protocols”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study was a preliminary study with a small convenience sample of treatment-seeking individuals and a high drop-out rate.

    “This is a preliminary study with a small convenience sample of treatment-seeking individuals and high drop-out rate that was not a double-blind and double-dummy study.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT00879996.

    “It was registered with the Food and Drug Administration (www.ClinicalTrials.gov) and was given the identifier number NCT00879996.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Methadone is a long-acting μ-opioid receptor agonist and an NMDA-receptor antagonist with a half-life of 27 ± 12 hours that is effective in treating pain and opioid addiction.

    “Methadone is a long-acting μ-opioid receptor agonist and an NMDA-receptor antagonist with a half-life of 27 ± 12 hours that is effective in treating pain and opioid addiction.15–17”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [15] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [16] Resine , T and Pasternak , G . 2001. “Opioid analgesics and antagonists”. Edited by: Hardman , J G , Limbird , L E and Gilman , A G . 521–55. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 10th ed.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [17] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Buprenorphine is a partial μ-opioid receptor agonist and κ-opioid receptor antagonist with a half-life of 2.33 ± 0.24 hours that might be an alternative to methadone because it is effective in treating opioid addiction or pain.

    “Buprenorphine, a partial μ-opioid receptor agonist and κ-opioid receptor antagonist with a half-life of 2.33 ± 0.24 hours might be an alternative to methadone because it is effective in treating opioid addiction or pain.21–26”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [21] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [23] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25] Mattick R P, 2008, Cochrane Database of Systematic Rev

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [26] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The treatment arms did not statistically differ at baseline in demographics, drug-taking history, treatment history, criminal history, self-reported alcohol, opiate, and other drug use, positive urine for cocaine, opiates, and other drugs, and pain.

    “The treatment arms did not statistically differ in participants’ demographics, drug-taking history, treatment history, criminal history, self-reported alcohol, opiate, and other drug use, positive urine for cocaine, opiates, and other drugs, and pain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The methadone dose range was chosen according to a recommendation by Hardman and associates that the typical initial oral dose of methadone for pain is 2.5 to 15 mg, depending on pain severity.

    “The dose range of methadone was chosen according to the recommendation by Hardman and associates stating that the typical initial oral dose of methadone for pain is 2.5 to 15 mg, depending on the severity of pain.16”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Resine , T and Pasternak , G . 2001. “Opioid analgesics and antagonists”. Edited by: Hardman , J G , Limbird , L E and Gilman , A G . 521–55. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 10th ed.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Long-acting opioids may offer pain control with a decreased risk for medication misuse.

    “Long-acting opioids may offer pain control with a decreased risk for medication misuse.14”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] Savage S R, 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    A diagnosis of opioid dependence was confirmed using the DAST score (>4) and a 7-item checklist based on DSM-IV-TR criteria for opioid dependence.

    “A diagnosis of opioid dependence was confirmed using the DAST score (> 4) and a 7-item checklist based on the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) for “opioid dependence.”30”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] American Psychiatric Association, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A case study of four chronic pain patients with co-existent opioid addiction who received methadone found that three stayed in treatment for 19-21 months and stopped intravenous use.

    “A case study of 4 chronic pain patients with co-existent opioid addiction who received methadone treatment found that 3 stayed in treatment for 19–21 months and stopped intravenous use.29”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Kennedy J A, 1990, JSAT

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Treatment with steady doses of buprenorphine/naloxone for six months results in treatment retention superior to detoxification followed by abstinence in chronic pain patients with co-existent opioid addiction.

    “According to Blondell and his associates, treatment with steady doses of buprenorphine/naloxone for 6 months results in treatment retention superior to detoxification followed by abstinence in chronic pain patients with a co-existent opioid addiction.13”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Buprenorphine's ceiling on agonist activity limits its abuse liability and reduces the probability of respiratory depression and overdose death, giving it a safety profile superior to methadone.

    “Buprenorphine’s ceiling on its agonist activity limits its abuse liability and reduces the probability of respiratory depression and overdose death, resulting in a safety profile superior to methadone.27”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Walsh S L, 1995, J Pharmacol Expl Ther source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Methadone or propoxyphene treatment produced better treatment retention than detoxification followed by psychotherapy in patients with chronic pain and co-existent addiction.

    “Similarly, Tennant and Rawson showed that methadone or propoxyphene treatment produced better treatment retention than detoxification followed by psychotherapy in patients with chronic pain and co-existent addiction.28”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In that case study, pain measured by the visual analogue scale did not significantly decrease.

    “Pain as measured by the visual analogue scale did not significantly decrease.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Kennedy J A, 1990, JSAT

      Not checked in the free run.

19 of 19
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Randomized clinical trials have not compared methadone and buprenorphine in patients with chronic pain and co-existent opioid addiction.

    “Randomized clinical trials have not compared methadone and buprenorphine in patients with chronic pain and co-existent opioid addiction.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Different percentages reported for the same completion count

    Minor

    The paper gives the same numerator and denominator for study completion but reports two slightly different percentages. One place says 26 participants were 48.1% of the sample, while another says 26 participants were 48.2%.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Brown R L, 1996, J Fam Pract, 43, 152
  2. Blondell R D, 2008, Am Fam Physician, 78, 1132
  3. Jackman R, 2008, Am Fam Physician, 78, 1155
  4. Last A R, 2009, Am Fam Physician, 79, 1067
  5. Mattick R P, 2008, Cochrane Database of Systematic Rev, 1, CD002207
  6. Kennedy J A, 1990, JSAT, 7, 233

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neumann, A. M., Blondell, R. D., Jaanimägi, U., Giambrone, A. K., Homish, G. G., Lozano, J. R., Kowalik, U., & Azadfard, M.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Journal of Addictive Diseases
Published
2013-01-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
68-78
ISSN
  • 1055-0887 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-0848
OpenAlex
W1968420582
Cited by
90
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Addictive Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R03DA029768)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
methadone, buprenorphine/naloxone, opioid use disorder, chronic pain, prescription opioids, analgesia, illicit opioid use, opioid use disorder treatment
MeSH terms
Administration, Sublingual, Analgesics, Opioid, Analysis of Variance, Buprenorphine, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Male, Methadone, Middle Aged, Naloxone, Opioid-Related Disorders, Severity of Illness Index, Substance Abuse Detection, Treatment Outcome, Chronic Pain, Prescription Drug Misuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review