Cited by 40Pain Management and Opioid UsePain Mechanisms and TreatmentsAnesthesia and Pain Management

Management of Chronic Neuropathic Pain With Methadone: A Review of 13 Cases

Altier, Nadège, Dion, Dominique, Boulanger, Aline, Choinière, Manon·2005·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

The synthetic opioid methadone has generated much interest in recent years among clinicians involved in the management of intractable chronic cancer pain. Its use as an analgesic is starting to extend to the treatment of noncancer pain, particularly neuropathic pain. Unfortunately, the evidence for its use in the management of neuropathic pain is limited to a few case studies. We examined retrospectively during a 12-month study period the clinical response of all 13 patients at our pain clinic who were prescribed methadone in an attempt to control neuropathic pain resistant to conventional analgesics. A questionnaire was also administered to the 9 patients who continued to take methadone at 12 months posttreatment. A total of 4 patients (31%) discontinued it by the end of the 12-month study period. Patients discontinued methadone due to the absence of pain relief and due to various intractable, undesirable side effects. Somnolence was the most common adverse effect reported, followed by nausea, constipation, and vomiting. All patients took coanalgesics (eg, amitriptyline, gabapentin) or other analgesics (eg, morphine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) during methadone treatment to control pain. The 9 patients who continued to take methadone at 12 months reported experiencing on average 43% pain relief (range 0-80%), 47% improvement in quality of life (range 0-100%), and 30% improvement in quality of sleep (range 0-60%). Methadone was effective at relieving pain and ameliorating quality of life and sleep in 62% of patients. These findings suggest that methadone can offer an acceptable success rate for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Prospective randomized, placebo-controlled studies are now needed to examine more rigorously the benefits of methadone for this type of pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ajp.0000125247.95213.53

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Altier, N., Dion, D., Boulanger, A., & Choinière, M.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Altier, Nadège
  • Dion, Dominique
  • Choinière, Manon
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2005-07
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
364-369
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008337251
Cited by
40
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
methadone, neuropathic pain, chronic pain management, synthetic opioids, non-cancer pain, analgesia, quality of life, sleep quality, adverse effects, sleepiness, gabapentin, amitriptyline, treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analgesics, Opioid, Chronic Disease, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Methadone, Middle Aged, Neuralgia, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Sleep Wake Disorders, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review