Convergence of Counterterrorism Policies: A Case Study of Kyrgyzstan and Central Asia
Abstract
Why do counterterrorism policies of the Central Asian states grow more alike amid propensities for divergence? This article engages with this question. It focuses on the counterterrorism measures of Kyrgyzstan and attributes their growing intensity to influence of the neighboring states and regional organizations. It is the contention of this research that Kyrgyzstan's increasingly vigorous responses aimed at combating terrorism are a part of a broader process of convergence of counterterrorism policies and measures targeting religious extremism adopted by Kyrgyzstan's neighbors. The three mechanisms that lie at the roots of this process are direct coercive transfer, harmonization of security policies, and emulation of counterterrorism responses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Authoritarian legal harmonization in the post-Soviet space
Lemon, E., & Antonov, O. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1778671 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Authoritarianism as an Institution? The Case of Central Asia
Buranelli, F. C. (2020) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqaa058 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“16 This has been explained with reference to Russia’s standing as ‘security guarantor’ in the region and as leader in numerous drills held under the CIS and CSTO umbr ellas (Omelicheva 2009).”
BackgroundWang, Y., Hong, S., Wang, Y., et al. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03069-0 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“1 3 attention to foreign policy in international relationships, health and disease prevention policies and security policies (Gould-Davies 2014; Ancker and Rechel 2013; Omelicheva 2009).”
BackgroundConverging party systems in Russia and Central Asia: A case of authoritarian norm diffusion?
Roberts, S. P. (2015) · Communist and Post-Communist Studies · doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2015.06.004 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“3 Omelicheva (2009) discussed ‘emulation’ as an explanation for the convergence of counter terrorism polices in Central Asia.”
BackgroundWhat Drives Diffusion? Anti-Terrorism Legislation in the Arab Middle East and North Africa
Josua, M. (2020) · Journal of Global Security Studies · doi:10.1093/jogss/ogaa049 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
The evolution of religious regulation in Central Asia, 1991–2018
Gamza, D., & Luong, P. J. (2020) · Central Asian Survey · doi:10.1080/02634937.2020.1836477 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“…key law (or set of laws) or a high-profile event (or series of events), without providing a full and systematic examination of the legal documents that constitute the full regulatory framework (Epkenhans 2009; Norwegian Helsinki Committee 2010; Omelicheva 2009; Zhovtis, Kabak, and Khaidarova 2015).”
BackgroundThe Strategic Ambiguity of the United Nations Approach to Preventing Violent Extremism
Thiessen, C. (2019) · Studies in Conflict and Terrorism · doi:10.1080/1057610x.2019.1647685 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The impulse to orthodoxy: why illiberal democracies treat religious pluralism as a threat
Levy, D. L. (2018) · Religion State & Society · doi:10.1080/09637494.2018.1492841 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Omelicheva (2009) argues that Central Asian states are simply replicating the religious and security policies enacted by Russia under a policy of ‘sovereign democracy’.”
BackgroundLegalizing control: the rise of restrictive internet regulation in sub-Saharan Africa
Schumann, M. P. (2026) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2025.2503370 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Lenshie, N. E., Miapyen, B. S., Ogbonna, C. N., Okengwu, K., Idris, A., & Ganiyu, A. D. (2023) · Journal of Asian and African Studies · doi:10.1177/00219096231207884 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Counterterrorism is a combination of domestic and foreign measures intended to restrain the behaviour of terrorists, their organisations and those connected to them to protect society from terrorism (Omelicheva, 2009).”
Lutter contre le terrorisme au nom de l’« esprit de Shanghai »
Valleau, A. (2022) · Peter Lang eBooks · doi:10.3726/b19312 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Taliban and Central Asia: Into the Vortex of Terrorism Beyond Afghanistan
Bandyopadhyay, L. (2010) · Jadavpur Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/0973598410110004 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Central Asia and Counterterrorism: The Contrasting Cases of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan
Foroughi, P., & Bekmurzaev, N. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-55769-8_25
TOPCU, M. C., & Kılıçoğlu, G. (2022) · Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute · doi:10.30794/pausbed.1097579
- Authors
- Omelicheva, M. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Omelicheva, Mariya Y.
- Venue
- Studies in Conflict & Terrorism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-10-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 893-908
- ISSN
- 1057-610X (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0731
- OpenAlex
- W2147229094
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Conflict and Terrorism (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
- Keywords
- counterterrorism policy, policy convergence, Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia, religious extremism, policy harmonization, regional security organizations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review