Cited by 60Political Conflict and GovernancePolicy Transfer and LearningPost-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics

Authoritarian legal harmonization in the post-Soviet space

Lemon, Edward, Antonov, Oleg·2020·Democratization

Abstract

Faced with common threats to their regimes from independent civil society, organized opposition groups and protest movements, authoritarian governments in the former Soviet Union have learned from one another and adopted similar policies to consolidate their power. This article examines the process of authoritarian policy transfer in three fields: peaceful assembly, civil society and political participation, focusing on Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. The article examines the role played by the Commonwealth of Independent States- Inter-parliamentary Assembly, the body charged with legal harmonization in the former Soviet Union and ignored thus far by scholars of authoritarian diffusion.Through causal process tracing and the use of document comparison software, we compare 34 laws and decrees. Our findings indicate that diffusion is no illusion in the former Soviet Union. Autocrats have adopted similar legislation in all three fields, with the greatest degree of convergence in laws related to extremism, terrorism and operational searches, all of which are used to pursue political opponents. Russia is usually, but not always, the policy innovator. The region’s poorest states – Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan – both dependent on Russia in economic, political and security spheres display the highest levels of legal harmonization with the former Soviet centre.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13510347.2020.1778671

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lemon, E., & Antonov, O.
Affiliations
  • Department of Regional Studies, Daniel Morgan Graduate School, Washington, DC, USA
  • Södertörn University (SE)
Corresponding author
Lemon, Edward
Venue
Democratization
Published
2020-06-17
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
1221-1239
ISSN
  • 1351-0347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-890X
OpenAlex
W3036637816
Cited by
60
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Democratization (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Keywords
policy diffusion, policy transfer, civil society restrictions, political participation, operational-search activity, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, post-Soviet states, regime consolidation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review