The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patterns of Internet and Traditional News Media Use in a Networked Community
Abstract
The growing popularity of the World Wide Web as a source of news raises questions about the future of traditional news media. Is the Web likely to become a supplement to newspapers and television news, or a substitute for these media? Among people who have access to newspapers, television, and the World Wide Web, why do some prefer to use the Web as a source of news, while others prefer traditional news media? Drawing from a survey of 520 undergraduate students at a large public university where Internet use is woven into the fabric of daily life, this study suggests that use of the Web as a news source is positively related with reading newspapers but has no relationship with viewing television news. Members of this community use the Web mainly as a source of entertainment. Patterns of Web and traditional media exposure are examined in light of computer anxiety, desire for control, and political knowledge. This study suggests that even when computer skills and Internet access become more widespread in the general population, use of the World Wide Web as a news source seems unlikely to diminish substantially use of traditional news media.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
On the Use of the Mass Media for Important Things
Katz, E., Haas, H., & Gurevitch, M. (1973) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094393 · Cited by 1,639
Ritualized and Instrumental Television Viewing
Rubin, A. M. (1984) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02174.x · Cited by 679
Why Communication Researchers Should Study the Internet: A Dialogue
Newhagen, J. E., & Rafaeli, S. (1996) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01458.x · Cited by 373
Why Communication Researchers Should Study the Internet: A Dialogue
Newhagen, J. E., & Rafaeli, S. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00172.x · Cited by 188
Scott, C. R., & Rockwell, S. C. (1997) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634529709379072 · Cited by 182
Investigating the Assumptions of Uses and Gratifications Research
Lometti, G. E., Reeves, B., & Bybee, C. R. (1977) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365027700400305 · Cited by 123
Cited by
Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
Bimber, B. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615573 · Cited by 526
(2010) · Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) · Cited by 151
Chan-Olmsted, S., Rim, H., & Zerba, A. (2013) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699012468742 · Cited by 136
Hyun, K. D., & Kim, J. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.994543 · Cited by 131
Wang, J., & Oh, J. I. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151310028 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Althaus, S. L., & Tewksbury, D.
- Venue
- Political Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-45
- ISSN
- 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-7675
- OpenAlex
- W2035625541
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 60.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
