Cited by 690Media Studies and CommunicationMedia and Digital CommunicationMedia Influence and Health

Ritualized and Instrumental Television Viewing

Rubin, Alan M.·1984·Journal of Communication

Abstract

Journal Article Ritualized and Instrumental Television Viewing Get access Alan M. Rubin Alan M. Rubin 1Alan M. Rubin is Associate Professor in the School of Speech Communication at Kent State University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Communication, Volume 34, Issue 3, September 1984, Pages 67–77, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02174.x Published: 07 February 2006

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02174.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubin, A. M.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
Rubin, Alan M.
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
1984-09-01
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
67-77
ISSN
  • 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2466
OpenAlex
W2158207082
Cited by
679
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 36
FWCI
98.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
television viewing, viewing motivation, audience behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review