Cited by 378Misinformation and Its ImpactsSocial Media and PoliticsSpam and Phishing Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Political Astroturfing on Twitter: How to Coordinate a Disinformation Campaign

Open access

Abstract

Political astroturfing, a centrally coordinated disinformation campaign in which participants pretend to be ordinary citizens acting independently, has the potential to influence electoral outcomes and other forms of political behavior. Yet, it is hard to evaluate the scope and effectiveness of political astroturfing without “ground truth” information, such as the verified identity of its agents and instigators. In this paper, we study the South Korean National Information Service’s (NIS) disinformation campaign during the presidential election in 2012, taking advantage of a list of participating accounts published in court proceedings. Features that best distinguish these accounts from regular users in contemporaneously collected Twitter data are traces left by coordination among astroturfing agents, instead of the individual account characteristics typically used in related approaches such as social bot detection. We develop a methodology that exploits these distinct empirical patterns to identify additional likely astroturfing accounts and validate this detection strategy by analyzing their messages and current account status. However, an analysis relying on Twitter influence metrics shows that the known and suspect NIS accounts only had a limited impact on political social media discussions. By using the principal-agent framework to analyze one of the earliest revealed instances of political astroturfing, we improve on extant methodological approaches to detect disinformation campaigns and ground them more firmly in social science theory.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10584609.2019.1661888

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1017/CBO9781139198752 · DOI
  2. Conover M., 2011, Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 89
  3. Faris, R., Roberts, H., Etling, B., Bourassa, N., Zuckerman, E. & Benkler, Y. (2017). Partisanship, propaganda, and disinformation: Online media and the 2016 U.S. presidential election (Berkman Klein Center Research Publication 2017-6). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3019414
  4. Howard P. N., 2006, New media campaigns and the managed citizen
  5. Keller F., 2017, Proceedings of the Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 564
  6. Linvill D. R., 2018, Troll factories: The internet research agency and state-sponsored agenda building
  7. Morstatter F., 2013, Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 400
  8. Ross S. A., 1973, The American Economic Review, 63, 134
  9. SeoulDistrictCourt, 2014, Case ID: 2013GoHap577, 2013GoHap1060
  10. SeoulHigherCourt, 2015, Case ID: 2014No2820
  11. Varol O., 2017, Proceedings of the Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 280

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–313 of 313

Metadata

Authors
Keller, F. B., Schoch, D., Stier, S., & Yang, J.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Stier, Sebastian
Venue
Political Communication
Published
2019-10-26
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
256-280
ISSN
  • 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7675
OpenAlex
W2971881481
Cited by
378
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 45
FWCI
73.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Political Communication (publishedVersion)
  • Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) (submittedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2016S1A3A2925033)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
Keywords
disinformation campaigns, Twitter, 2012 South Korean presidential election, social bots, principal-agent model, election interference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review