The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced permeability and retention of macromolecular drugs in solid tumors: A royal gate for targeted anticancer nanomedicines
Abstract
Over the past two decades cancer has ascended the causes of human death to be number one or two in many nations world wide. A major limitation inherent to most conventional anticancer chemotherapeutic agents is their lack of tumor selectivity. One way to achieve selective drug targeting to solid tumors is to exploit abnormalities of tumor vasculature, namely, hypervascularisation; aberrant vascular architecture; extensive production of vascular permeability factors stimulating extravasation within tumor tissues; and lack of lymphatic drainage. Maeda and his colleagues have extensively studied tumor vascular abnormalities in terms of active and selective delivery of anticancer drugs to tumor tissues, notably defining the enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR effect) of macromolecular drugs in solid tumors. Due to their large molecular size, nanosized macromolecular anticancer drugs administered intravenously (i.v.) escape renal clearance. Often they can not penetrate the tight endothelial junctions of normal blood vessels, but they can extravasate in tumour vasculature and become trapped in the tumor vicinity. With time the tumor concentration will build up reaching several folds higher than that of the plasma due to lack of efficient lymphatic drainage in solid tumor; an ideal application for EPR-based selective anticancer drug delivery. Establishing this principle hastened development of various polymer conjugates and polymeric micelles as well as multifunctional nanoparticles for targeted cancer chemotherapy. Indeed this selective high local concentration of nanosized anticancer drugs in tumor tissues has proven superior in therapeutic effect with minimal side effects in both preclinical and clinical settings. In this review the mechanisms and factors involved in the EPR effect, as well as the uniqueness of nanoscale drugs for tumor targeting through EPR effect, will be discussed in detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease
Folkman, J. (1995) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0195-27 · Cited by 7,627
Transplacental Carcinogenesis by Stilbestrol
Folkman, J. (1971) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197108122850711 · Cited by 2,640
Maeda, H. (2001) · Advances in Enzyme Regulation · doi:10.1016/s0065-2571(00)00013-3 · Cited by 2,495
Cited by
Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles
Alexis, F., Pridgen, E., Molnar, L. K., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2008) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp800051m · Cited by 3,699
Poly(ethylene glycol) in Drug Delivery: Pros and Cons as Well as Potential Alternatives
Knop, K., Hoogenboom, R., Fischer, D., & Schubert, U. S. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200902672 · Cited by 3,533
Nicolas, J., Mura, S., Brambilla, D., Mackiewicz, N., & Couvreur, P. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35265f · Cited by 1,270
Challenges in Development of Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics
Desai, N. (2012) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-012-9339-4 · Cited by 1,173
Nichols, J. W., & Bae, Y. H. (2014) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.057 · Cited by 834
Metadata
- Authors
- Greish, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Drug Targeting
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 457-464
- ISSN
- 1026-7158 (ISSN-L)
- 1061-186X
- 1029-2330
- OpenAlex
- W2035926815
- Cited by
- 600
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced permeability and retention of macromolecular drugs in solid tumors: A royal gate for targeted anticancer nanomedicines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10611860701539584
- The paper
- Greish, K. (2007). Enhanced permeability and retention of macromolecular drugs in solid tumors: A royal gate for targeted anticancer nanomedicines. Journal of Drug Targeting. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611860701539584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.