Cited by 21Sport Psychology and PerformanceAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Thought Occurrence Questionnaire for Sport (TOQS) among adolescent athletes

Lane, Andrew M., Harwood, Chris, Nevill, Alan M.·2005·Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

Abstract

There is an inherent link between theory and measurement suggesting that validation of measures should be the first stage of theory testing. The aim of the present study was to cross-validate the factorial validity of the Thought Occurrence Questionnaire for Sport for use among adolescent athletes. National standard young athletes (Individual N = 204; Team N = 360) completed the TOQS questionnaire. Single-sample and multisample confirmatory factor analysis provided support for the psychometric integrity of the hypothesized three-factor correlated model. Multisample results demonstrated invariance for factor loadings and correlations between individual and team athletes. Internal consistency coefficients were over the .70 criterion for acceptability. Findings lend support to previous validation studies conducted on samples of adult athletes and suggest that the TOQS provides an equally valid measure for use among adolescent athletes. It is suggested that the TOQS can be used to investigate theoretical issues related to cognitive interference during competition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615800500134266

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bentler , P. M. , & Wu , E. J. C. (1995) . EQS/Windows user's guide . Multivariate Software , Encino, CA
  2. Cox , R. H. (2000) . Confirmatory factor analysis of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 . Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Applied Sport Psychology Conference , p. 49 .
  3. 10.1080/02699930903412120 · DOI
  4. Lee-Hill , K. 2000 . Frameworks for sport psychologists , Champaign, IL : Human Kinetics .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lane, A. M., Harwood, C., & Nevill, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Wolverhampton (GB)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Lane, Andrew M.
Venue
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
Published
2005-09
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
245-254
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W2116305732
Cited by
21
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
  • Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
youth athletes, cognitive interference, competitive anxiety, questionnaire validation, measurement invariance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review