The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of emotion regulation strategies on anxiety during job interviews in Chinese college students
Abstract
Background and objectives Few studies related to the impact of different emotion regulation strategies on anxiety have used externally and ecologically valid emotion-eliciting stimuli or Eastern populations. The present study compares the effects of reappraisal, suppression, and acceptance on anxiety induced by a simulated job interview in a Chinese sample. Methods Eighty-two subjects were randomly assigned to one of four instructions: reappraisal, suppression, acceptance, or no-regulation strategies during a simulated job interview. Anxiety was assessed with an observer-based behavior rating scale during the interview and the State Anxiety Inventory before, during, and after the interview. Results A repeated-measures MANOVA indicated a significantly greater reduction in anxiety in the reappraisal and acceptance groups compared to the control group during the interview (reappraisal: d = 1.42; acceptance: d = 1.30; each p max Conclusions In Chinese students reappraisal and acceptance seem to be more effective anxiety regulation strategies than suppression.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While prior studies have made strides in illuminating the ramifications of perfectionism, the distinctive milieu of Chinese postgraduate studies remains relatively underexplored, notwithstanding its potent implications for both pedagogical practice and student well-being”
From SELF-INVESTIGATION INTO REPERCUSSIONS OF PERFECTIONIST BEHAVIOR ON ACADEMIC ANXIETY AND FLEXIBILITY AMONGST CHINESE POSTGRADUATES (2023) · cites this paper as Gong et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
Gross, J. J. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.224 · Cited by 4,671 · cited 1×
“The instructions for each group were similar to those used in previous studies (e.g., Gross, 1998; Gross & Levenson, 1997; Hofmann et al., 2009; Szasz et al., 2011), but were modified to reflect the current interview requirements.”
MethodWebb, T. L., Miles, E., & Sheeran, P. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0027600 · Cited by 2,006 · cited 5×
“Despite this dearth of research, behavior is of particular importance because the regulation of behavioral expressions of emotion has important social functions (Webb et al., 2012).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialHiding feelings: The acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion
Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1997) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.106.1.95 · Cited by 1,834
Emotional suppression: Physiology, self-report, and expressive behavior.
Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.970 · Cited by 1,262
The Tie That Binds? Coherence Among Emotion Experience, Behavior, and Physiology.
Mauss, I. B., Levenson, R. W., McCarter, L., Wilhelm, F. H., & Gross, J. J. (2005) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.175 · Cited by 1,201
Emotion regulation and culture: are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific?
Butler, E. A., Lee, T. L., & Gross, J. J. (2007) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.30 · Cited by 986
Bonanno, G. A., Papa, A., Lalande, K., Westphal, M., & Coifman, K. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00705.x · Cited by 969 · cited 2×
“characteristics, and these may moderate the efficacy of ER (Bonanno et al., 2004).”
BackgroundThe Future of Emotion Regulation Research: Capturing Context
Aldao, A. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612459518 · Cited by 948
Campbell-Sills, L., Barlow, D. H., Brown, T. A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.001 · Cited by 845 · cited 10×
“Consistent with Campbell-Sills et al. (2006a) and Levitt et al. (2004), our results indicated that acceptance reduces anxiety more effectively than suppression during the stressful interview task. According to the theory of limited resources (Ochsner & Gross, 2005), acceptance helps to reserve resources that can be us…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAcceptability and suppression of negative emotion in anxiety and mood disorders.
Campbell-Sills, L., Barlow, D. H., Brown, T. A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2006) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.4.587 · Cited by 579 · cited 6×
“…for moderating physiological rather than experiential and behavioral arousal (Aldao & Mennin, 2012; Hofmann et al., 2009), whereas others have found that acceptance moderates both physiological arousal and subjective experience (Campbell-Sills et al., 2006a; Wolgast, Lundh, & Viborg, 2011).”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1016/j.brat.2011.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5127/jep.028112 · DOI
- Chen, P. (2006).The psychological study on Chinese’s“Ren”. (Unpublished master's thesis), Nanjing, CN: Nanjing Normal University. (in Chinese).
- 10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.659 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brat.2009.05.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.031 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.224 · DOI · Paper page
- Gross J. J., 2007, Handbook of emotion regulation, 3
- Hayes S. C., 1999, Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change.
- Hofmann S. G., 2008, Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 200
- 10.1159/000119004 · DOI · Paper page
- Kitayama S., 2004, The regulation of emotion, 251
- 10.1080/02699930802619031 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00002.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 · DOI · Paper page
- Qiu L., 2008, Chinese Journal Applied Psychology, 14, 249
- 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00481.x · DOI
- Wang D. F., 2006, Sinica Acta Psychologica, 4, 543
- Wang X. D. (Ed.)., 1993, Chinese Journal of Mental Health (supplementary issue, 205
- 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.brat.2011.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10608-012-9477-0 · DOI
- Xiong W. R., 2010, Advances in Psychological Science, 5, 849
- 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9852.2011.10.012 · DOI
- 10.1080/08934210409389373 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0097420.t002 · DOI
- Zhou T., 2012, Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1, 64
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wei, L.-W. (2023) · European Journal of Education Studies · doi:10.46827/ejes.v10i12.5111 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Gong, L., Li, W., Zhang, D., & Rost, D. H.
- Venue
- Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-06-19
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 305-317
- ISSN
- 1061-5806
- 1477-2205
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 15
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Key Grant Project of China Ministry of Education (10JHQ003)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
