Cited by 13Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The relationship between suppression and subsequent intrusions: the mediating role of peritraumatic dissociation and anxiety

Măirean, Cornelia, Ceobanu, Ciprian Marius·2017·Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

Abstract

Background and objectives Although previous studies showed that thought and emotion suppression represent risk factors for intrusions development, the mechanisms that explain these relations were less explored. This study aims to examine the relationships between thought and emotion suppression and the symptoms of intrusion following the exposure to a trauma-related event. Moreover, we explored if these relationships would be mediated by peritraumatic state dissociation and state anxiety. Design and methods The trauma film paradigm was used and the participants were students (N = 148) experimentally exposed to an aversive film to model a traumatic experience. Thought and emotion suppression were measured before the trauma exposure. After exposure, the participants completed scales for measuring state dissociation and state anxiety. Intrusive images and thoughts of the film were recorded in the subsequent week using an intrusion diary. Results Thought suppression predicted intrusive thoughts frequency, and this effect was mediated by the peritraumatic anxiety. State anxiety predicted both intrusive images and thoughts, while state dissociation only predicted intrusive images. Conclusions Intrusive images and intrusive thoughts are different phenomena and they are predicted by different variables. The practical implications of these results for posttraumatic stress disorder treatment and secondary traumatization are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615806.2016.1263839

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Măirean, C., & Ceobanu, C. M.
Affiliations
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO)
Corresponding author
Măirean, Cornelia
Venue
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
Published
2016-12-08
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
304-316
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W2553642904
Cited by
13
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
thought suppression, emotional suppression, intrusive thoughts, intrusive images, peritraumatic dissociation, state anxiety, trauma exposure, trauma film paradigm, post-traumatic stress disorder, secondary traumatic stress, mediation
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Stress, Psychological, Students, Thinking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review