Cited by 130Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Peritraumatic dissociation as a predictor of post-traumatic stress disorder: a critical review

Candel, Ingrid, Merckelbach, Harald·2004·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

In psychiatric literature, dissociative reactions at the time of a traumatic event (i.e., peritraumatic dissociation) are considered to be risk factors for the development of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In this article, we critically review research concerned with the link between peritraumatic dissociation and PTSD. Our main point is that studies in this area heavily rely on retrospective reports of dissociative reactions during the trauma. We argue that this methodology has important limitations since people in general and PTSD patients in particular find it difficult to give accurate descriptions of past emotional states. Restrictive factors that play a role in this context have to do with forgetting, attribution, and malingering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comppsych.2003.09.012

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Candel, I., & Merckelbach, H.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Candel, Ingrid
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
44-50
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112055342
Cited by
130
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
peritraumatic dissociation, post-traumatic stress disorder, risk factors, retrospective reports, dissociative reactions, memory retrieval, attribution, malingering
MeSH terms
Dissociative Disorders, Humans, Mental Recall, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Wounds and Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review