The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors Motivating Citizen Engagement in Mobile Sensing: Insights from a Survey of Non-Participants
Abstract
Mobile sensing uses features of mobile technology to monitor the environment and if a community participates in such monitoring, there can be community improvements in the quality of life. Despite the numerous potential benefits, the rate of citizen engagement in mobile sensing is generally low. Using the urban sensing project called “2Loud?,” this study was designed to uncover the reasons for non-participation and to discuss the motivations for intention to participate. A survey was administered to citizens who had been invited to participate but had decided not to participate. Examining the four motivational factors of “Concern,” “Belief,” “Technology,” and “Time” through a series of Kruskal-Wallis H Tests indicated that respondents had a statistically significant favorable attitude toward “Intention to Participate” if they had some concern and belief, and if they had access to technology and available time, compared to those who did not. However, binary logistic regression analysis indicated that only “Time” and “Technology” were significant predictors of “Intention to Participate.” These findings are discussed in light of social psychology and information technology theories, and recommendations for improved communication and engagement strategies are suggested.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These tools can capture the nuances of everyday life, how people interact with their surroundings, how they feel and perceive their immediate envi ronment (Leao & Izadpahani, 2016).”
From Women's perceived safety in public places and public transport: A narrative review of contributing factors and measurement methods (2025) · cites this paper as Leao & Izadpahani, 2016
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Sanders, C., Rogers, A., Bowen, R., Bower, P., Hirani, S., Cartwright, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Knapp, M., Barlow, J., Hendy, J., et al. (2012) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-220 · Cited by 450
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10630732.2014.942092 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1461444809355111 · DOI
- 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/cdj/35.1.41 · DOI
- 10.3109/03014460.2013.806590 · DOI
- 10.1109/MCOM.2013.6525603 · DOI
- 10.1109/MCOM.2014.6917406 · DOI
- 10.1177/0899764096254006 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2675133.2675260 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6 · DOI
- 10.11113/jt.v77.6806 · DOI
- 10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181 · DOI
- 10.1086/208831 · DOI
- 10.1006/jevp.1999.0141 · DOI
- Gergen K.J., 2002, Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance
- 10.1016/j.comnet.2015.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10708-008-9183-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-36071-8_2 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1986.tb01441.x · DOI
- 10.1109/MCOM.2010.5560598 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10661-014-3848-9 · DOI
- 10.2753/JEC1086-4415110401 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0090375 · DOI
- 10.1108/IJPCC-04-2014-0030 · DOI
- Preece J., 2009, AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 13, 10.17705/1thci.00005 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1023042708217 · DOI
- 10.1111/1464-0597.00053 · DOI
- 10.1080/01449290512331321910 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_18 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/SURV.2012.031412.00077 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dubey, S., Bailey, A., & Lee, J. (. (2025) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105534 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Leao, S., & Izadpahani, P.
- Corresponding author
- Leao, Simone
- ORCID
- Leao, Simone
- Venue
- Journal of Urban Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 85-103
- ISSN
- 1063-0732 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-1853
- OpenAlex
- W2532539529
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Urban Technology (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- City of Boroondara (Victoria, Australia)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographic Information Systems Studies
- Keywords
- citizen participation, mobile sensing, urban sensing, non-participation, intention to participate, motivational factors, concern, belief, access to technology, engagement strategies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors Motivating Citizen Engagement in Mobile Sensing: Insights from a Survey of Non-Participants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10630732.2016.1175824
- The paper
- Leao, S., & Izadpahani, P. (2016). Factors Motivating Citizen Engagement in Mobile Sensing: Insights from a Survey of Non-Participants. Journal of Urban Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2016.1175824