Teaching Music in an Era of High-Stakes Testing and Budget Reductions
Abstract
Prior research suggests that the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is having an adverse effect on school music programs, particularly in schools that have not made “adequate yearly progress.” In many instances, music programs are being reduced or eliminated, music teachers are being required to assist with the teaching of other subjects, academically low-achieving students are being precluded from participating in music, and the overall time allotted for music is being reduced. Because the arts are excluded from NCLB's list of tested subjects—that is, subjects for which schools are held accountable—music has been relegated to a noncore status, even though the law identifies the arts as a core academic subject. This article discusses changing paradigms within music education and how some music teachers are adapting to these shifts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Schools that fail to meet the academic progress required by federal or state legislation may struggle to maintain instructional time and financial support for their music programs.
“schools that fail to meet the academic progress required by federal or state legislation may struggle to maintain instructional time and financial support for their music programs”
From Understanding Participation in Secondary Music Classes: A Literature Review (2020) · cites this paper as West, 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shaw, R. D., & Auletto, A. (2022) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.1177/0022429421989961 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Understanding Participation in Secondary Music Classes: A Literature Review
Pendergast, S. (2020) · Update: Applications of Research in Music Education · doi:10.1177/8755123320928479 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- West, C.
- Affiliations
- Ithaca College (US)
- Corresponding author
- West, Chad
- ORCID
- West, Chad
- Venue
- Arts Education Policy Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-79
- ISSN
- 1063-2913 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-4395
- OpenAlex
- W2052257977
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 91.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Arts Education Policy Review (publishedVersion)
- Digital Collections - Ithaca College Library (Ithaca College) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Music Education and Analysis
- Keywords
- music education, No Child Left Behind Act, high-stakes testing, school budget cuts, arts education policy, music teachers, Adequate Yearly Progress, low-achieving students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review