Cited by 53Diverse Music Education InsightsArt Education and DevelopmentMusic Education and Analysis

Teaching Music in an Era of High-Stakes Testing and Budget Reductions

West, Chad·2012·Arts Education Policy Review

Abstract

Prior research suggests that the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is having an adverse effect on school music programs, particularly in schools that have not made “adequate yearly progress.” In many instances, music programs are being reduced or eliminated, music teachers are being required to assist with the teaching of other subjects, academically low-achieving students are being precluded from participating in music, and the overall time allotted for music is being reduced. Because the arts are excluded from NCLB's list of tested subjects—that is, subjects for which schools are held accountable—music has been relegated to a noncore status, even though the law identifies the arts as a core academic subject. This article discusses changing paradigms within music education and how some music teachers are adapting to these shifts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10632913.2012.656503

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Schools that fail to meet the academic progress required by federal or state legislation may struggle to maintain instructional time and financial support for their music programs.

    “schools that fail to meet the academic progress required by federal or state legislation may struggle to maintain instructional time and financial support for their music programs”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
West, C.
Affiliations
Ithaca College (US)
Corresponding author
West, Chad
Venue
Arts Education Policy Review
Published
2012-01
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
75-79
ISSN
  • 1063-2913 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-4395
OpenAlex
W2052257977
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
91.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arts Education Policy Review (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Collections - Ithaca College Library (Ithaca College) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Music Education and Analysis
Keywords
music education, No Child Left Behind Act, high-stakes testing, school budget cuts, arts education policy, music teachers, Adequate Yearly Progress, low-achieving students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review