Access to Music Education with Regard to Race in Two Urban Areas
Abstract
This quantitative study examined access to school music instruction with regard to race in two urban areas: Detroit, Michigan, and Washington, DC, in 2009–2010. We found significant differences in the provision of music instruction between schools with high and low proportions of nonwhite enrollment, in categories including curricular offerings, extracurricular offerings, and resources. In the Detroit area, only 31 percent to 60 percent of schools with high percentages of nonwhite students offered any music instruction at all. We contrast our findings with those of a National Center for Educational Statistics report to demonstrate how regional and national averages can obscure information that should guide policy, such as the influence of location and racial demographics of schools on the provision of public school music instruction. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of using flawed data in the creation of policy and suggestions for more comprehensive and accurate data collection and analysis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Regional and local factors can influence access to secondary music course offerings, especially for marginalized students.
“Regional and local factors can also have an influence on access to secondary music course offerings, especially for marginalized students”
From Understanding Participation in Secondary Music Classes: A Literature Review (2020) · cites this paper as Salvador & Allegood, 2014
Detroit schools offered less music instruction in schools where the majority of the population were students of color, while Washington, D.C., schools did not have the same disparities.
“Detroit schools offered less music instruction in schools where the majority of the population were students of color, while Washington, D.C., schools did not have the same disparities”
From Understanding Participation in Secondary Music Classes: A Literature Review (2020) · cites this paper as Salvador & Allegood, 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shaw, R. D., & Auletto, A. (2022) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.1177/0022429421989961 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Understanding Participation in Secondary Music Classes: A Literature Review
Pendergast, S. (2020) · Update: Applications of Research in Music Education · doi:10.1177/8755123320928479 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Salvador, K., & Allegood, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan–Flint (US)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Salvador, Karen
- ORCID
- Salvador, Karen
- Venue
- Arts Education Policy Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-07-03
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 82-92
- ISSN
- 1063-2913 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-4395
- OpenAlex
- W2035493642
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 31.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Arts Education Policy Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Music Education and Analysis
- Keywords
- access to music education, school music instruction, racial disparities, urban schools, Detroit, Washington, D.C., school resources, music education policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review