The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Southern Hemisphere Biogeography Inferred by Event-Based Models: Plant versus Animal Patterns
Abstract
The Southern Hemisphere has traditionally been considered as having a fundamentally vicariant history. The common trans-Pacific disjunctions are usually explained by the sequential breakup of the supercontinent Gondwana during the last 165 million years, causing successive division of an ancestral biota. However, recent biogeographic studies, based on molecular estimates and more accurate paleogeographic reconstructions, indicate that dispersal may have been more important than traditionally assumed. We examined the relative roles played by vicariance and dispersal in shaping Southern Hemisphere biotas by analyzing a large data set of 54 animal and 19 plant phylogenies, including marsupials, ratites, and southern beeches (1,393 terminals). Parsimony-based tree fitting in conjunction with permutation tests was used to examine to what extent Southern Hemisphere biogeographic patterns fit the breakup sequence of Gondwana and to identify concordant dispersal patterns. Consistent with other studies, the animal data are congruent with the geological sequence of Gondwana breakup: (Africa(New Zealand(southern South America, Australia))). Trans-Antarctic dispersal (Australia <--> southern South America) is also significantly more frequent than any other dispersal event in animals, which may be explained by the long period of geological contact between Australia and South America via Antarctica. In contrast, the dominant pattern in plants, (southern South America(Australia, New Zealand)), is better explained by dispersal, particularly the prevalence of trans-Tasman dispersal between New Zealand and Australia. Our results also confirm the hybrid origin of the South American biota: there has been surprisingly little biotic exchange between the northern tropical and the southern temperate regions of South America, especially for animals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Amazonia Through Time: Andean Uplift, Climate Change, Landscape Evolution, and Biodiversity
Hoorn, C., Wesselingh, F. P., ter Steege, H., Bermudez, M. A., Mora, A., Sevink, J., Sanmartín, I., Sanchez-Meseguer, A., Anderson, C. L., Figueiredo, J. P., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1194585 · Cited by 2,404
Self-citationPhylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale
Crisp, M. D., Arroyo, M. T. K., Cook, L. G., Gandolfo, M. A., Jordan, G. J., McGlone, M. S., Weston, P. H., Westoby, M., Wilf, P., & Linder, H. P. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07764 · Cited by 734
The resurrection of oceanic dispersal in historical biogeography
QUEIROZ, A. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.11.006 · Cited by 692
Dating nodes on molecular phylogenies: a critique of molecular biogeography
Heads, M. (2005) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00052.x · Cited by 266
Upchurch, P., Andres, B., Butler, R. J., & Barrett, P. M. (2015) · Historical Biology · doi:10.1080/08912963.2014.939077 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanmartín, I., & Ronquist, F.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 216-243
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2109096901
- Cited by
- 943
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Southern Hemisphere Biogeography Inferred by Event-Based Models: Plant versus Animal Patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10635150490423430
- The paper
- Sanmartín, I., & Ronquist, F. (2004). Southern Hemisphere Biogeography Inferred by Event-Based Models: Plant versus Animal Patterns. Systematic Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490423430
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.