Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 734

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale

Open access
Crisp, Michael D., Arroyo, Mary T. K., Cook, Lyn G., Gandolfo, Maria A., Jordan, Gregory J., McGlone, Matt S., Weston, Peter H., Westoby, Mark, Wilf, Peter, Linder, H. Peter·2009·Nature

Abstract

The degree to which plants and animals retain their ancestral ecological traits and environmental distributions ('niche conservatism') is hotly debated, in part because of its relevance to the fate of modern species facing climate change. A tendency towards conservatism has been demonstrated previously on the local and regional scales, and now a study of more than 11,000 plant species from across the Southern Hemisphere confirms a similar phenomenon on a global scale. Only 3.6% of the evolutionary divergences observed involved a shift of biome, suggesting that many species have only a limited capacity to adapt to new biomes, making them particularly susceptible to ecological change. How constrained is the ecology of a species by its phylogenetic history? The authors assess the extent of biome conservatism — the tendency of a species to occupy the same niche as its ancestors — in over 11,000 Southern Hemisphere plants, 15% of the total flora of the Southern Hemisphere continents. They show that only 3.6% of the evolutionary divergences in their study involved a shift of biome, demonstrating the strong influence of biome conservatism. How and why organisms are distributed as they are has long intrigued evolutionary biologists1,2,3,4. The tendency for species to retain their ancestral ecology has been demonstrated in distributions on local and regional scales5,6,7, but the extent of ecological conservatism over tens of millions of years and across continents has not been assessed8,9,10,11,12,13. Here we show that biome stasis at speciation has outweighed biome shifts by a ratio of more than 25:1, by inferring ancestral biomes for an ecologically diverse sample of more than 11,000 plant species from around the Southern Hemisphere. Stasis was also prevalent in transocean colonizations. Availability of a suitable biome could have substantially influenced which lineages establish on more than one landmass, in addition to the influence of the rarity of the dispersal events themselves. Conversely, the taxonomic composition of biomes has probably been strongly influenced by the rarity of species’ transitions between biomes. This study has implications for the future because if clades have inherently limited capacity to shift biomes13, then their evolutionary potential could be strongly compromised by biome contraction as climate changes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature07764

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 734

Metadata

Authors
Crisp, M. D., Arroyo, M. T. K., Cook, L. G., Gandolfo, M. A., Jordan, G. J., McGlone, M. S., Weston, P. H., Westoby, M., Wilf, P., & Linder, H. P.
Venue
Nature
Published
2009-02-15
Volume
458
Issue
7239
Pages
754-756
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2074334981
Cited by
734
References
35
FWCI
44.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature07764
The paper
Crisp, M. D., Arroyo, M. T. K., Cook, L. G., Gandolfo, M. A., Jordan, G. J., McGlone, M. S., Weston, P. H., Westoby, M., Wilf, P., & Linder, H. P. (2009). Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07764

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.