The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale
Open accessAbstract
The degree to which plants and animals retain their ancestral ecological traits and environmental distributions ('niche conservatism') is hotly debated, in part because of its relevance to the fate of modern species facing climate change. A tendency towards conservatism has been demonstrated previously on the local and regional scales, and now a study of more than 11,000 plant species from across the Southern Hemisphere confirms a similar phenomenon on a global scale. Only 3.6% of the evolutionary divergences observed involved a shift of biome, suggesting that many species have only a limited capacity to adapt to new biomes, making them particularly susceptible to ecological change. How constrained is the ecology of a species by its phylogenetic history? The authors assess the extent of biome conservatism — the tendency of a species to occupy the same niche as its ancestors — in over 11,000 Southern Hemisphere plants, 15% of the total flora of the Southern Hemisphere continents. They show that only 3.6% of the evolutionary divergences in their study involved a shift of biome, demonstrating the strong influence of biome conservatism. How and why organisms are distributed as they are has long intrigued evolutionary biologists1,2,3,4. The tendency for species to retain their ancestral ecology has been demonstrated in distributions on local and regional scales5,6,7, but the extent of ecological conservatism over tens of millions of years and across continents has not been assessed8,9,10,11,12,13. Here we show that biome stasis at speciation has outweighed biome shifts by a ratio of more than 25:1, by inferring ancestral biomes for an ecologically diverse sample of more than 11,000 plant species from around the Southern Hemisphere. Stasis was also prevalent in transocean colonizations. Availability of a suitable biome could have substantially influenced which lineages establish on more than one landmass, in addition to the influence of the rarity of the dispersal events themselves. Conversely, the taxonomic composition of biomes has probably been strongly influenced by the rarity of species’ transitions between biomes. This study has implications for the future because if clades have inherently limited capacity to shift biomes13, then their evolutionary potential could be strongly compromised by biome contraction as climate changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2009) · Cited by 6,571
A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data
Lewis, P. O. (2001) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/106351501753462876 · Cited by 2,929
Niche Conservatism: Integrating Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation Biology
Wiens, J. J., & Graham, C. H. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431 · Cited by 2,615
Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness
Wiens, J. J., & Donoghue, M. J. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.011 · Cited by 1,962
Losos, J. B. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01229.x · Cited by 1,728
Conservatism of Ecological Niches in Evolutionary Time
Peterson, A. T., Soberón, J., & Sánchez-Cordero, V. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5431.1265 · Cited by 1,515
Angiosperm Biogeography and Past Continental Movements
Raven, P. H., & Axelrod, D. I. (1974) · Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden · doi:10.2307/2395021 · Cited by 1,329
Predicting the Geography of Species’ Invasions via Ecological Niche Modeling
Peterson, A. T. (2003) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/378926 · Cited by 1,141
Niche dynamics in space and time
Pearman, P. B., Guisan, A., Broennimann, O., & Randin, C. F. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.005 · Cited by 1,042
Southern Hemisphere Biogeography Inferred by Event-Based Models: Plant versus Animal Patterns
Sanmartín, I., & Ronquist, F. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490423430 · Cited by 943
Cited by
Simon, M. F., Grether, R., de Queiroz, L. P., Skema, C., Pennington, R. T., & Hughes, C. E. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0903410106 · Cited by 1,056
Plant DNA barcodes and a community phylogeny of a tropical forest dynamics plot in Panama
Kress, W. J., Erickson, D. L., Jones, F. A., Swenson, N. G., Perez, R., Sanjur, O., & Bermingham, E. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0909820106 · Cited by 722
Functional traits, the phylogeny of function, and ecosystem service vulnerability
Díaz, S., Purvis, A., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Mace, G. M., Donoghue, M. J., Ewers, R. M., Jordano, P., & Pearse, W. D. (2013) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.601 · Cited by 644
Next‐generation dynamic global vegetation models: learning from community ecology
Scheiter, S., Langan, L., & Higgins, S. I. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12210 · Cited by 498
Livistona palms in Australia: ancient relics or opportunistic immigrants?
Crisp, M. D., Isagi, Y., Kato, Y., Cook, L. G., & Bowman, D. M. J. S. (2010) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.09.020 · Cited by 72
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Crisp, M. D., Arroyo, M. T. K., Cook, L. G., Gandolfo, M. A., Jordan, G. J., McGlone, M. S., Weston, P. H., Westoby, M., Wilf, P., & Linder, H. P.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2009-02-15
- Volume
- 458
- Issue
- 7239
- Pages
- 754-756
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2074334981
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 44.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature07764
- The paper
- Crisp, M. D., Arroyo, M. T. K., Cook, L. G., Gandolfo, M. A., Jordan, G. J., McGlone, M. S., Weston, P. H., Westoby, M., Wilf, P., & Linder, H. P. (2009). Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07764
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.