The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Compositional Heterogeneity
Abstract
Compositional heterogeneity among lineages can compromise phylogenetic analyses, because models in common use assume compositionally homogeneous data. Models that can accommodate compositional heterogeneity with few extra parameters are described here, and used in two examples where the true tree is known with confidence. It is shown using likelihood ratio tests that adequate modeling of compositional heterogeneity can be achieved with few composition parameters, that the data may not need to be modelled with separate composition parameters for each branch in the tree. Tree searching and placement of composition vectors on the tree are done in a Bayesian framework using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. Assessment of fit of the model to the data is made in both maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian frameworks. In an ML framework, overall model fit is assessed using the Goldman-Cox test, and the fit of the composition implied by a (possibly heterogeneous) model to the composition of the data is assessed using a novel tree-and model-based composition fit test. In a Bayesian framework, overall model fit and composition fit are assessed using posterior predictive simulation. It is shown that when composition is not accommodated, then the model does not fit, and incorrect trees are found; but when composition is accommodated, the model then fits, and the known correct phylogenies are obtained.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, protein evolution is not homogeneous.”
From Improved Modeling of Compositional Heterogeneity Supports Sponges as Sister to All Other Animals (2017) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution.
Posada, D., & Crandall, K. A. (1998) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817 · Cited by 19,820
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., & Yano, T.-A. (1985) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02101694 · Cited by 8,687
Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo Computation and Bayesian Model Determination
Green, P. J. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.711 · Cited by 5,941
(1964) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3210-2.50006-6 · Cited by 3,130
Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny and Its Impact on Evolutionary Biology
Huelsenbeck, J. P., Ronquist, F., Nielsen, R., & Bollback, J. P. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065889 · Cited by 2,737
Markov Chasin Monte Carlo Algorithms for the Bayesian Analysis of Phylogenetic Trees
Larget, B. R., & Simon, D. L. (1999) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026160 · Cited by 1,637
Molecular Systematics: 1994–1995
Sytsma, K. J., & Hahn, W. J. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60458-4_21 · Cited by 1,173
Likelihood-Based Tests of Topologies in Phylogenetics
Goldman, N., Anderson, J. P., & Rodrigo, A. G. (2000) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/106351500750049752 · Cited by 1,086
Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution.
Lockhart, P., Steel, M., Hendy, M., & Penny, D. (1994) · Molecular biology and evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040136 · Cited by 1,018
Bayesian Selection of Continuous-Time Markov Chain Evolutionary Models
Suchard, M. A., Weiss, R. E., & Sinsheimer, J. S. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003872 · Cited by 791
Phylogenetic Methods Come of Age: Testing Hypotheses in an Evolutionary Context
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Rannala, B. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5310.227 · Cited by 781
Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution
Goldman, N. (1993) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00166252 · Cited by 736
Gupta, R. S. (1998) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.62.4.1435-1491.1998 · Cited by 598
A Nonhyperthermophilic Common Ancestor to Extant Life Forms
Galtier, N., Tourasse, N., & Gouy, M. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5399.220 · Cited by 442
Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation.
Yang, Z., Goldman, N., & Friday, A. (1994) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040112 · Cited by 433
Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and proteinsequences: paralinear distances.
Lake, J. A. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.4.1455 · Cited by 424
Molecular phylogenetics: state-of-the-art methods for looking into the past
Whelan, S., Lió, P., & Goldman, N. (2001) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02272-7 · Cited by 420
Maximum-likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data
Yang, Z. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02352289 · Cited by 409
A Compound Poisson Process for Relaxing the Molecular Clock
Huelsenbeck, J. P., Larget, B. R., & Swofford, D. L. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/154.4.1879 · Cited by 348
Heterotachy, an Important Process of Protein Evolution
Lopez, P., Casañe, D., & Philippe, H. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003973 · Cited by 341
Galtier, N., & Gouy, M. (1998) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025991 · Cited by 335
Compositional Bias May Affect Both DNA-Based and Protein-Based Phylogenetic Reconstructions
Foster, P. G., & Hickey, D. A. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/pl00006471 · Cited by 332
Self-citationRecovering a tree from the leaf colourations it generates under a Markov model
Steel, M. (1994) · Applied Mathematics Letters · doi:10.1016/0893-9659(94)90024-8 · Cited by 299
Mathematical Elegance with Biochemical Realism: The Covarion Model of Molecular Evolution
Penny, D., McComish, B. J., Charleston, M. A., & Hendy, M. D. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s002390010258 · Cited by 287
Are Guinea Pigs Rodents? The Importance of Adequate Models in Molecular Phylogenetics
Sullivan, J. M., & Swofford, D. L. (1997) · Journal of Mammalian Evolution · doi:10.1023/a:1027314112438 · Cited by 283
Eisen, J. A. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00173192 · Cited by 271
Bayesian Model Adequacy and Choice in Phylogenetics
Bollback, J. P. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004175 · Cited by 215
On the use of nucleic acid sequences to infer early branchings in the tree of life.
Yang, Z., & Roberts, D. (1995) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040220 · Cited by 210
Substitutional bias confounds inference of cyanelle origins from sequence data
Lockhart, P. J., Howe, C. J., Bryant, D. A., Beanland, T. J., & Larkum, A. W. D. (1992) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00182392 · Cited by 174
The evolution of base composition and phylogenetic inference
Mooers, A. Ø., & Holmes, E. C. (2000) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01934-0 · Cited by 168
Tests of applicability of several substitution models for DNA sequence data.
Rzhetsky, A., & Nei, M. (1995) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040182 · Cited by 159
Tarrı́o, R., Rodrı́guez-Trelles, F., & Ayala, F. J. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003932 · Cited by 94
Heterogeneity of Nucleotide Frequencies Among Evolutionary Lineages and Phylogenetic Inference
Rosenberg, M. S. (2003) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msg067 · Cited by 88
Murray, R. G. E. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2191-1_42 · Cited by 82
Tarrı́o, R., Rodrı́guez-Trelles, F., & Ayala, F. J. (2000) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1006/mpev.2000.0813 · Cited by 73
Conant, G. C., & Lewis, P. O. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003874 · Cited by 70
Walmsley, J. L., Troen, I., Lalas, D. P., & Mason, P. J. (1996) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789814447164_0022 · Cited by 65
Embley, T. M., Thomas, R. H., & Williams, R. A. D. (1993) · Systematic and Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0723-2020(11)80247-x · Cited by 53
Factors Influencing the Growth and Maintenance of Tubed Cultures of Embryonic Chick Cells
Thomas, J. P., & Ritter, H. B. (1968) · Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1128/am.16.1.25-28.1968 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Sokal, 1981, Biometry
- Swofford, 2002, PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4
- Swofford, 1996, Phylogenetic inference, 407
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life
Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., & Philippe, H. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1603 · Cited by 1,264
Keane, T., Creevey, C. J., Pentony, M. M., Naughton, T. J., & Mclnerney, J. O. (2006) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-6-29 · Cited by 1,070
Lartillot, N., Brinkmann, H., & Philippe, H. (2007) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-s1-s4 · Cited by 705
Taxon sampling and the accuracy of phylogenetic analyses
(2008) · Journal of Systematics and Evolution · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1002.2008.08016 · Cited by 553
Archaea and the origin of eukaryotes
Eme, L., Spang, A., Lombard, J., Stairs, C. W., & Ettema, T. J. G. (2017) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.133 · Cited by 575
Metadata
- Authors
- Foster, P. G.
- Affiliations
- Natural History Museum (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Foster, Peter G
- ORCID
- Foster, Peter G
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 485-495
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2168573791
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 4.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Systematic Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- compositional heterogeneity, phylogenetic models, likelihood ratio test, model fit assessment, posterior predictive simulation, Bayesian phylogenetics, Markov chain Monte Carlo, tree search, model misspecification
- MeSH terms
- Base Composition, Bayes Theorem, Classification, Computer Simulation, Markov Chains, Models, Genetic, Monte Carlo Method, Phylogeny, Likelihood Functions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review