The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing the Reliability of Genetic Methods of Species Identification via Simulation
Abstract
Although genetic methods of species identification, especially DNA barcoding, are strongly debated, tests of these methods have been restricted to a few empirical cases for pragmatic reasons. Here we use simulation to test the performance of methods based on sequence comparison (BLAST and genetic distance) and tree topology over a wide range of evolutionary scenarios. Sequences were simulated on a range of gene trees spanning almost three orders of magnitude in tree depth and in coalescent depth; that is, deep or shallow trees with deep or shallow coalescences. When the query's conspecific sequences were included in the reference alignment, the rate of positive identification was related to the degree to which different species were genetically differentiated. The BLAST, distance, and liberal tree-based methods returned higher rates of correct identification than did the strict tree-based requirement that the query was within, but not sister to, a single-species clade. Under this more conservative approach, ambiguous outcomes occurred in inverse proportion to the number of reference sequences per species. When the query's conspecific sequences were not in the reference alignment, only the strict tree-based approach was relatively immune to making false-positive identifications. Thresholds affected the rates at which false-positive identifications were made when the query's species was unrepresented in the reference alignment but did not otherwise influence outcomes. A conservative approach using the strict tree-based method should be used initially in large-scale identification systems, with effort made to maximize sequence sampling within species. Once the genetic variation within a taxonomic group is well characterized and the taxonomy resolved, then the choice of method used should be dictated by considerations of computational efficiency. The requirement for extensive genetic sampling may render these techniques inappropriate in some circumstances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
(1987) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · Cited by 59,715
A Simple, Fast, and Accurate Algorithm to Estimate Large Phylogenies by Maximum Likelihood
Guindon, S., & Gascuel, O. (2003) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150390235520 · Cited by 16,806
Biological identifications through DNA barcodes
Hebert, P. D. N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L., & deWaard, J. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 · Cited by 13,376
bold : The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org)
RATNASINGHAM, S., & HEBERT, P. D. N. (2007) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x · Cited by 6,376
Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes
Hebert, P. D. N., Stoeckle, M. Y., Zemlak, T. S., & Francis, C. M. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312 · Cited by 2,653
Funk, D. J., & Omland, K. E. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132421 · Cited by 2,237
DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling
Meyer, C. P., & Paulay, G. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422 · Cited by 1,957
Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants
Kress, W. J., Wurdack, K. J., Zimmer, E. A., Weigt, L. A., & Janzen, D. H. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0503123102 · Cited by 1,953
BOLD : The Barcode of Life Data System (www.barcodinglife.org)
Ratnasingham, S., & Ebert, P. D. N. H. (2007) · Cited by 1,676
Rambaut, A., & Grass, N. C. (1997) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/13.3.235 · Cited by 1,574
Cited by
Validation of the ITS2 Region as a Novel DNA Barcode for Identifying Medicinal Plant Species
Chen, S., Yao, H., Han, J., Liu, C., Song, J., Shi, L., Zhu, Y., Ma, X., Gao, T., Pang, X., et al. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008613 · Cited by 1,650
The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH‐BOL
Ward, R. D., Hanner, R., & Hebert, P. D. N. (2009) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02080.x · Cited by 964
The seven deadly sins of DNA barcoding
Collins, R. A., & Cruickshank, R. H. (2013) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12046 · Cited by 560
Tanabe, A. S., & Toju, H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076910 · Cited by 300
Identification of medicinal plants in the family Fabaceae using a potential DNA barcode ITS2
Gao, T., Yao, H., Song, J., Liu, C., Zhu, Y., Ma, X., Pang, X., Xu, H., & Chen, S. (2010) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2010.04.026 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Ross, H. A., Murugan, S., & Sibon Li, W. L.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-04-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 216-230
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2059934244
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 16.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing the Reliability of Genetic Methods of Species Identification via Simulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10635150802032990
- The paper
- Ross, H. A., Murugan, S., & Sibon Li, W. L. (2008). Testing the Reliability of Genetic Methods of Species Identification via Simulation. Systematic Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150802032990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.