Cited by 183Fish Ecology and Management StudiesGenetic diversity and population structureFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Population structure of Columbia River basin Chinook salmon and steelhead trout

BRANNON, ERNEST L., POWELL, MADISON S., QUINN, THOMAS P., TALBOT, ANDRÉ·2004·Reviews in Fisheries Science

Abstract

The population structure of chinook salmon and steelhead trout is presented as an assimilation of the life history forms that have evolved in synchrony with diverse and complex environments over their Pacific range. As poikilotherms, temperature is described as the overwhelming environmental influence that determines what life history options occur. The different populations represent ecological types referred to as spring-, summer-, fall, and winter-run segments, as well as stream- and ocean-type, or stream- and ocean-maturing life history forms. However, they are more correctly described as a continuum of forms that fall along a temporal cline related to incubation and rearing temperatures that determine spawn timing and juvenile residence patterns. Population structure of chinook salmon and steelhead in the Columbia Basin, therefore, is the reflection of the genetic composition of the founding source or sources within the respective region, shaped by the environment, principally temperature, that defines life history evolutionary strategy to maximize fitness under the conditions delineated. The key in developing an effective recovery program for chinook salmon and steelhead is to recognize that measures taken must address the genetic and biological requirements of the population unit within the environmental template identified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10641260490280313

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the summer-fall period, the sources of these fish included cold rivers such as those draining Mt. St. Helens in Washington, where salmon would have later hatch times and reduced growth rates, and this could explain their small size late in the season.

    “For the latter period, the sources of these fish included cold rivers such as those draining Mt.St. Helens in Washington, where salmon would have later hatch times and reduced growth rates (Reimers and Loeffel 1967;Brannon et al. 2004), and this could explain their small size late in the season.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BRANNON, E. L., POWELL, M. S., QUINN, T. P., & TALBOT, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Idaho (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission
Venue
Reviews in Fisheries Science
Published
2004-04
Volume
12
Issue
2-3
Pages
99-232
ISSN
  • 1064-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-6553
OpenAlex
W2043795961
Cited by
183
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reviews in Fisheries Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, steelhead, population structure, temperature effects, spawning timing, incubation temperature, rearing temperature, genetic composition, population units, Columbia River Basin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review