The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heavy Metal Phytoremediation from Aquatic Ecosystems with Special Reference to Macrophytes
Abstract
The rapid pace of industrialization and urbanization has given birth to heavy metal pollution. Heavy metals are one of the most hazardous contaminants that may be present in the aquatic environment. It derives its origin from both natural and anthropogenic sources. Heavy metal pollution in aquatic ecosystem poses a serious threat to aquatic biodiversity, and drinking contaminated water poses severe health hazards in humans. The economic aspects and side effects of conventional treatment technologies in aquatic ecosystems paved the way to phytoremediation technology. In phytoremediation, plants are used to ameliorate the environment from various hazardous pollutants. It is cost-effective and eco-friendly technology for environmental cleanup. The characteristics, general mechanism, and ecology of metal hyper-accumulation have been discussed previously. The present review examines the role of aquatic macrophytes in phytoremediation studies. Macrophytes are potent tools in the abatement of heavy metal pollution in aquatic ecosystems receiving industrial effluents and municipal wastewater. They are preferred over other bio-agents due to low cost, frequent abundance in aquatic ecosystems, and easy handling. Aquatic macrophytes usually follow the mechanism of rhizo-filtration for metal removal. The efficiency and selection of potent aquatic plants is done through microcosm investigation, and an overview of significant works is given here. Aquatic macrophytes in natural and constructed wetlands proved to be a potent tool for the treatment of heavy metals from industrial effluents. Physico-chemical factors like temperature, pH, light, salinity, and presence of other heavy metal may affect the metal uptake. Both live and dead biomass of macrophytes may be used in phytoremediation, though dead biomass is generally preferred in the treatment of industrial effluents due to reduced cost, easy disposal, and lack of active biochemical machinery leading to metal toxicity and death of plants. Biomass disposal problem and seasonal growth of aquatic macrophytes are some of the limitations in the transfer of phytoremediation technology from the lab to the field. However, an eco-sustainable model has been developed through our various works that may curb some of the limitations. Disposed biomass of macrophytes may be used for many fruitful applications. Genetic engineering, biodiversity prospecting, and X-ray diffraction spectroscopy are promising future prospects regarding the use of macrophytes in phytoremediation studies. A multidisciplinary and integrated approach may enable this embryonic technology to become the new frontier in environmental science and technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals
Nriagu, J. O., & Pacyna, J. M. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/333134a0 · Cited by 4,368
A long way ahead: understanding and engineering plant metal accumulation
Clemens, S., Palmgren, M. G., & Krämer, U. (2002) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02295-1 · Cited by 1,265
AtPCS1, a phytochelatin synthase from Arabidopsis : Isolation and in vitro reconstitution
Vatamaniuk, O. K., Mari, S., Lu, Y.-P., & Rea, P. A. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.12.7110 · Cited by 410
A family of phytochelatin synthase genes from plant, fungal and animal species
Cobbett, C. (1999) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(99)01465-x · Cited by 63 · cited 1×
“PCs are a family of peptides with the general structure (γ -Glu-Cys) n-Gly, where n equals 2–11 (Cobett, 2000; Rauser, 1990), which are rapidly synthesized in response to toxic levels of heavy metals (Cobbett, 1999; Zenk, 1996).”
Background
Cited by
Invasive alien plant species: Their impact on environment, ecosystem services and human health
Kumar Rai, P., & Singh, J. S. (2020) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106020 · Cited by 616
Mani, D., & Kumar, C. (2014) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-013-0299-8 · Cited by 615
Rezania, S., Taib, S. M., Md Din, M. F., Dahalan, F. A., & Kamyab, H. (2016) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.07.053 · Cited by 600
Nanoparticle-plant interaction: Implications in energy, environment, and agriculture
Rai, P. K., Kumar, V., Lee, S., Raza, N., Kim, K.-H., Ok, Y. S., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2018) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.012 · Cited by 313
Self-citationSanmuga Priya, E., & Senthamil Selvan, P. (2017) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.03.002 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Rai, P. K.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-08-31
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 697-753
- ISSN
- 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6537
- OpenAlex
- W1974125277
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heavy Metal Phytoremediation from Aquatic Ecosystems with Special Reference to Macrophytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10643380801910058
- The paper
- Rai, P. K. (2009). Heavy Metal Phytoremediation from Aquatic Ecosystems with Special Reference to Macrophytes. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380801910058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.