Cited by 2Musculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationInnovations in Medical EducationMotor Control and Adaptation

A novel model for developing thrust joint manipulation skills: a teaching and learning perspective

Open access
Adams, Kyle R., Kolb, William H., Geiser, Mary Beth, Dolphin, Michelle·2024·Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy

Abstract

Spinal and extremity thrust joint manipulation (TJM) has been shown to be an effective intervention when treating patients with various musculoskeletal conditions. Learning skilled TJM requires the proper execution of many discrete tasks. If any of these are missing, effectiveness and safety may be limited. While it is accepted that practice and feedback are important when physical therapists are learning clinical tasks, the best type of practice has not been identified for learning to perform TJM tasks. In this paper, we propose an educational model for instruction of joint manipulation that: 1) standardizes feedback terminology and 2) describes a core set of four discrete tasks (lift, drop, pull, and combination-rotation) that apply to most TJM tasks. The model includes instructing TJM tasks followed by identifying key errors related to the components of setup and thrust. Once these key errors have been identified, intentional practice activities are provided to address the noted positional and movement errors. Finally, reassessment is performed to determine if errors have diminished. This model is similar to the test-retest approach that is commonly used when treating patients. We hope this educational model will provide a framework for teaching TJM and will also foster future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10669817.2023.2299184

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: abe- havioral emphasis. 5th ed. 2011. https://psycnet.apa. org›record›2011-15560-000
  2. Fitts PM, Posner MI Human performance. Published online 1967. https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1967- 35040-000.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, K. R., Kolb, W. H., Geiser, M. B., & Dolphin, M.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University (US)
  • Radford University (US)
  • Regis University (US)
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
Corresponding author
Adams, Kyle R.
Venue
Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy
Published
2024-01-11
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
412-420
ISSN
  • 1066-9817 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-6186
OpenAlex
W4390789667
Cited by
2
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
no funding associated with the work
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
deliberate practice, positional error, motion error, musculoskeletal manipulation, educational models
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Humans, Learning, Manipulation, Orthopedic, Teaching, Models, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review