The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mighty Morphin’ age progression: how artist, age range, and morphing influences the similarity of forensic age progressions to target individuals
Abstract
When children go missing, authorities sometimes release age progressed images that are intended to approximate the person's current appearance. The current studies measured the influence of the range between the time when the child went missing and the age portrayed in the age progression on the similarity between the progressions and current images of the targets. Experiment 1 examined whole face images and Experiment 2 examined internal features only. Eight artists were recruited to produce progressions at three age ranges. Also included were averaged (morphed) images made of progressions of the same individual at a given range by different artists. Progressions across shorter ranges produced images more similar than those across longer ranges, and target comparisons yielded higher similarity ratings than foil comparisons. Although there was much variability among artists, the morphed images performed better than the average rating given to all age progressions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Age progression images are difficult to get right, subjective and variable even when a high degree of anatomical and artistic modelling expertise is applied.
“Nevertheless, the they are difficult to get right, subjective and variable even when a high degree of anatomical and artistic modelling expertise is applied [20].”
From Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: Age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data (2019) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.03.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.08.008 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.894 · DOI
- 10.1093/ejo/12.3.290 · DOI
- Chan J. P. K., 2012, Frontiers in Psychology, 87, 1
- 10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Enlow D. H., 1996, Essentials of facial Growth
- Feik S. A., 1998, Craniofacial identification in forensic medicine, 204
- 10.1080/13506280601058951 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506285.2012.743936 · DOI
- 10.1080/00140139.2011.623328 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scijus.2012.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10979-006-9007-2 · DOI
- 10.1080/1068316X.2010.499873 · DOI
- Lampinen J. M., 2010, Protecting children from violence: Evidence based interventions, 129, 10.4324/9780203852927 · DOI
- Lampinen J. M., Handbook of missing persons
- 10.1002/acp.1819 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.3.4.406 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-1523.5.3.478 · DOI
- 10.2307/1422130 · DOI · Paper page
- Taylor K., 2001, Forensic art and illustration
- 10.1037/a0018801 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139049566 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koudelová, J., Hoffmannová, E., Dupej, J., & Velemínská, J. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212618 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Lampinen, J. M., Erickson, W. B., Frowd, C., & Mahoney, G.
- Venue
- Psychology, Crime & Law
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-09-21
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 952-967
- ISSN
- 1068-316X
- 1477-2744
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Division of Social and Economic Sciences (1155207)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
