Cited by 30Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityDrug Solubulity and Delivery Systems

Design and fungicidal activity of mucoadhesive lactoferrin tablets for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidosis

Open access
Kuipers, Mirjam E., Heegsma, Jannet, Bakker, Hester I., Meijer, Dick K. F., Swart, Pieter J., Frijlink, Erik W., Eissens, Anco C., Vries-Hospers, Hilly G. de +1 more·2002·Drug Delivery

Abstract

Lactoferrin (Lf) is a potential drug candidate for the treatment of oropharyngeal Candida infections. However, for an effective therapeutic treatment an appropriate dosage form is required. Therefore a mucoadhesive tablet for buccal application was developed. Tablets of sufficient strength could be produced on high speed tabletting machines, but they could only be obtained when the protein contained at least 7% moisture. The tablet contained sodium alginate both for its release-controlling properties as well as for its mucoadhesive properties. Furthermore, phosphate buffer was added to keep the pH of the saliva in the mouth within the range of 6.5 to 7.5. In this pH range, Lf has shown to have its highest activity against Candida growth inhibition. The tablet formulation containing Lf had the same antifungal properties as compared with Lf alone, because in most cases identical inhibitory concentrations were observed against several clinical isolates of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. In human volunteers the tablets, containing 250 mg Lf and placed in each pouch, were able to keep the Lf concentration in the saliva at effective levels for at least 2 hr, while the pH of the saliva remained within the desired range. We concluded that the developed mucoadhesive tablet can improve the therapeutic efficacy of Lf and that it is suitable for further clinical research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/107175402753413154

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Administration of the glycoprotein lactoferrin can be a valid prospect for C. albicans treatment through sequestration of iron and direct toxicity, and this led to the development of a mucoadhesive tablet containing lactoferrin for treatment of oropharyngeal candidosis.

    “Administration of the glycoprotein lactoferrin can be a valid prospect for C. albicans treatment through not only sequestration of iron, but also direct toxicity and this led to the development of a mucoadhesive tablet containing lactoferrin for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidosis (Kuipers et al., 2002; Bai et al., 2006; Velliyagounder et al., 2015).”

    From Iron at the Centre of Candida albicans Interactions (2018) · cites this paper as Kuipers et al., 2002

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bouwstra, J. A., and Junginger, H. E. 1993. Hydrogels. In Encyclopedia of phar- maceutical technology, vol. 7, eds. J. Swarbrick and J. C. Boylan, 441-465, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
  2. Kamath, K. R., and Park, K. 1994. Mucosal adhesive preparations. In Ency- clopedia of pharmaceutical technology, vol. 10, eds. J. Swarbrick and J. C. Boylan, 133-163, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
  3. Kuipers, M. E., de Vries, H. G., Heegsma, J. H., Van den Berg, J. J. M., Meijer, D. K. F., and Swart, P. J. 2001. Conditions in uencing the antifungal activity of lactoferrin and antifungal drugs against clinical isolates of Candida. Apmis, In press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuipers, M. E., Heegsma, J., Bakker, H. I., Meijer, D. K. F., Swart, P. J., Frijlink, E. W., Eissens, A. C., Vries-Hospers, H. G. D., & J. M. van den Berg, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Venue
Drug Delivery
Published
2002-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
31-38
ISSN
  • 1071-7544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0464
OpenAlex
W2022877803
Cited by
30
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Delivery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
Keywords
lactoferrin, mucoadhesive tablets, buccal drug delivery, oropharyngeal candidiasis, Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, sodium alginate, antifungal activity, salivary pH, protein stability, tablet formulation
MeSH terms
Adhesiveness, Administration, Buccal, Adult, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Oral, Delayed-Action Preparations, Female, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Lactoferrin, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mouth Mucosa, Saliva, Tablets, Drug Design, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review