Cited by 44Spinal Cord Injury ResearchStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

The effects of semi-immersive virtual reality therapy on standing balance and upright mobility function in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: A preliminary study

Open access
An, Chang-Man, Park, Young-Hyun·2018·The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) commonly face persistent balance or mobility impairments. Virtual reality (VR) therapy is a useful rehabilitation approach; however, little is known about its effects in individuals with chronic iSCI. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of semi-immersive VR therapy on standing balance and upright mobility function in individuals with chronic iSCI. METHODS: Ten subjects with chronic iSCI underwent VR therapy 30 minutes a day, 3 days a week, for 6 weeks. Limit of stability (LOS) and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) were used to evaluate standing balance function. The Timed Up & Go (TUG) test, Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABS) Scale, and Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury-II (WISCI-II) were used to measure the subject's upright mobility function. Outcomes were assessed and recorded pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: After semi-immersive VR therapy, LOS and BBS scores were significantly increased. In addition, the TUG test results increased significantly over time, while ABC scale scores and WSCI-II levels improved significantly. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to assess the effects of semi-immersive VR therapy for patients with chronic iSCI and limited functional abilities. These results indicated that semi-immersive VR therapy has a positive effect and is a useful intervention for standing balance and upright mobility function in patients with chronic iSCI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10790268.2017.1369217

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
An, C.-M., & Park, Y.-H.
Affiliations
  • Jeonbuk National University Hospital (KR)
  • Hanseo University (KR)
Corresponding author
An, Chang-Man
Venue
The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Published
2017-09-07
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
223-229
ISSN
  • 1079-0268 (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-7723
OpenAlex
W2750599034
Cited by
44
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Instituto de Sistemas Complejos de Ingeniería
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
standing balance, balance rehabilitation, walking function, balance confidence, stability boundaries, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go test
MeSH terms
Adult, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Spinal Cord Injuries, Mobility Limitation, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review