College Student Preferences for Substance Use Disorder Educational Videos: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: College student preferences regarding substance use disorder (SUD) education and treatment-related education have been understudied, despite this population's relatively high risk of developing SUDs and low help-seeking rates. We sought to identify students' preferences regarding content, style, and format of educational online videos about SUDs and SUD treatment. METHOD: We held six, two-hour long focus groups with college student participants from Indiana University from 2017 to 2018 during which participants were shown drafts of scripts, mock-up images, and animation and then asked open-ended questions about their preferences and suggested changes. Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed. Researchers then undertook thematic analysis of focus groups: independently coding transcripts for data related to the research questions, conducting consensus coding, and then analyzing coded data for themes. RESULTS: 39 students participated in focus groups, approximately half of whom were undergraduate students and the other half were graduate students. They preferred animated video characters that were relatable to college students but abstract enough to represent a range of students, such as stick figures with backpacks. They preferred conversational narration with subtle humor and references to realistic reasons for college students using drugs or alcohol. Participants encouraged inclusion of information about SUD impacts on school, work, and relationships, in addition to physical health. Participants opposed any content or style that could be interpreted as fear-mongering. They requested more information regarding medication-assisted treatment efficacy and less information about side effects. CONCLUSION: College students have unique cultural needs, necessitating tailored educational interventions about SUD and SUD treatments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data from focus groups with college students indicate students prefer that programming acknowledge the reasons students use alcohol and other drugs and oppose content that could be interpreted as fear-mongering.
“Indeed, data from focus groups with college students indicate students prefer that programming acknowledge the reasons students use alcohol and other drugs and oppose content that could be interpreted as fear-mongering (Andraka-Christou et al., 2019).”
From The substance use disorder treatment gap among US college students: Findings from the 2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2024) · cites this paper as Andraka-Christou et al., 2019
Cites
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690600500107 · Cited by 11,829 · see citing works
Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory
Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., & Devers, K. J. (2007) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x · Cited by 3,437 · see citing works
Schulenberg, J., Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P., Bachman, J., Miech, R., & Patrick, M. (2008) · doi:10.3998/2027.42/146531 · Cited by 1,143 · see citing works
Prevention, early intervention, harm reduction, and treatment of substance use in young people
Stockings, E., Hall, W. D., Lynskey, M., Morley, K. I., Reavley, N., Strang, J., Patton, G., & Degenhardt, L. (2016) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(16)00002-x · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Carter, A. C., Brandon, K. O., & Goldman, M. S. (2010) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2010.71.742 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Opioid agonist treatment for pharmaceutical opioid dependent people
Nielsen, S., Larance, B., Degenhardt, L. J., Gowing, L., Kehler, C., & Lintzeris, N. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011117.pub2 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
College students rarely seek help despite serious substance use problems
Caldeira, K. M., Kasperski, S. J., Sharma, E., Vincent, K. B., O'Grady, K. E., Wish, E. D., & Arria, A. M. (2009) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2009.04.005 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Andraka‐Christou, B., & Capone, M. J. (2018) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.11.021 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Self-citationEmerging adult age status predicts poor buprenorphine treatment retention
Schuman-Olivier, Z., Weiss, R. D., Hoeppner, B. B., Borodovsky, J., & Albanese, M. J. (2014) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2014.04.006 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Blanc, N., & Brigaud, E. (2013) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.769832 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Defensive responses to an emotive anti-alcohol message
Brown, S. L., & Locker, E. (2008) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870440801911130 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Arnaud, N., Baldus, C., Elgán, T. H., Paepe, N. D., Tønnesen, H., Csémy, L., & Thomasius, R. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4643 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Patrick, M. E., Yeomans‐Maldonado, G., & Griffin, J. L. (2015) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.3109/10826084.2015.1074694 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
The Glass Is Half Full: Evidence for Efficacy of Alcohol-Wise at One University But Not the Other
Croom, K., Staiano‐Coico, L., LESSER, M. L., Lewis, D. K., Reyna, V. F., Marchell, T. C., Frank, J., & Ives, S. (2015) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1012239 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Skinner, M. L., Haggerty, K. P., Casey-Goldstein, M., Thompson, R. W., Buddenberg, L., & Mason, W. A. (2016) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2016.1227847 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Barry, A. E., Hobbs, L. A., Haas, E. J., & Gibson, G. C. (2015) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1018645 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Wotring, A. J., Paprzycki, P., Wagner-Greene, V. R., Wygonik, Q. R., Blavos, A. A., Kruger, J. S., Castor, T., Kruse‐Diehr, A. J., & Glassman, T. (2018) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2018.1506790 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pasman, E., Blair, L., Solberg, M. A., McCabe, S. E., Schepis, T., & Resko, S. M. (2024) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports · doi:10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100279 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Andraka-Christou, B., Alex, B., & Lyneé Madeira, J.
- Affiliations
- Department of Health Management & Informatics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA;
- Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
- Maurer School of Law, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
- Venue
- Substance Use & Misuse
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-03-12
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1400-1407
- ISSN
- 1082-6084 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2491
- OpenAlex
- W2921164909
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Substance Use & Misuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Alkermes, Inc.
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Keywords
- university students, animated characters, health communication, medication-assisted treatment, help-seeking, fearmongering, personalized interventions, alcohol and drug use
- MeSH terms
- Female, Health Education, Humans, Indiana, Male, Students, Universities, Focus Groups, Substance-Related Disorders, Qualitative Research, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review