Cited by 273Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHigher Education Research StudiesAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

The college and noncollege experience: a review of the factors that influence drinking behavior in young adulthood

Open access
Carter, Ashlee C., Brandon, Karen Obremski, Goldman, Mark S.·2010·Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To place college drinking within its larger developmental context, we reviewed studies that compare drinking behavior among college students with that of their age-matched non-student peers. Among the recurrent themes identified across these studies, we particularly noted discrepancies in the conceptualization and operationalization of both college status and noncollege status. These discrepancies, and other methodological variations, were then examined because they influence conclusions about drinking outcomes. METHOD: Eighteen studies directly comparing college students with nonstudents were reviewed. RESULTS: College students drank more than noncollege peers and, in general, drank more frequently than did noncollege peers, although these differences were likely the result of factors other than college attendance itself. Younger people drank more than older peers in both groups. College students also tended to be more at risk for alcohol-related problems, including alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence, again likely the result of factors other than college attendance per se. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the lack of consensus in the conceptualization and operationalization of college and noncollege status across studies, as well as the importance of variables such as living situation, age, full-time and part-time status, and type of college, which may be more directly related to variations in alcohol consumption than is college status itself. Future investigations of college drinking should place this phenomenon within the larger context of developmental processes associated with this time of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.742

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are potential differences in alcohol and cannabis use between students and non-students.

    “There are potential differences in alcohol and cannabis use between students and non-students (Carter et al., 2010; Linden-Carmichael & Lanza, 2018)”

    From Examining the Prospective Associations Between Mindfulness Facets and Substance Use in Emerging Adulthood. (2021) · cites this paper as Carter et al., 2010

    The Abstract and Study outcomes sections report differences in alcohol use between college students and nonstudents. The passages do not report a comparison of cannabis use between those groups; cannabis-related work appears only in the References. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Goldman, M. S., Boyd, G. M., & Faden, V. (Eds.). (2002). College drink- ing, what it is, and what to do about it: A review of the state of science. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement No. 14, 5-240.
  2. White, H. R., Labouvie, E. W., & Papadaratsakis, V. (2005). Changes in sub- stance use during the transition to adulthood: A comparison of college students and their noncollege peers. Journal of Drug Issues, 35, 281-306.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carter, A. C., Brandon, K. O., & Goldman, M. S.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Published
2010-09
Volume
71
Issue
5
Pages
742-750
ISSN
  • 1937-1888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-4114
OpenAlex
W1978673167
Cited by
273
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA016091, R01AA008333)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
college drinking, early adulthood, alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems, alcohol abuse, alcoholism, living situation, part-time students, age differences in drinking
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Students, Universities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review