Cited by 70Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentHomelessness and Social Issues

Effects of Social Support and 12-Step Involvement on Recovery among People in Continuing Care for Cocaine Dependence

Open access
Lookatch, Samantha J., Wimberly, Alexandra S., McKay, James R.·2019·Substance Use & Misuse

Abstract

Background: Social networks that support recovery lead to enhanced treatment outcomes and sobriety regardless if this support stems from family, peer groups or 12-Step programs. Treatment process factors including readiness to change and commitment to abstinence also impact substance use. However, little is understood about the relationship between social support to treatment process factors during and after treatment for substance use disorders. Objectives: To identify the ways in which different social networks foster substance use change in a sample of individuals with cocaine dependence from intensive outpatient programs (IOPs). Methods: Data were drawn from two studies examining adults (N = 489) with cocaine dependence in IOPs for substance use disorders collected between 2004 and 2009. Assessment data were collected at 3- to 6-month intervals from baseline to 24-months and included the University of Rhode Island change assessment questionnaire, timeline followback, thoughts about abstinence, perceived social support – friend, and family versions and analyzed using GEE and mediational analyses. Results: Greater perceived friend social support was associated with greater readiness to change whereas greater perceived familial social support was associated with substance use goal; greater social support from both friends and family were associated with less substance use. Greater AA/NA participation was associated with substance use goal and readiness to change, and less substance use. Substance use goals partially mediated the impact of social support on later substance use. Conclusions/Importance: While peer and familial support are key to sustained recovery, their impact differentially affects treatment process variables. This information could be used to inform social support treatment interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10826084.2019.1638406

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quality and meaningfulness of ongoing support connections is particularly influential in goals relating to problematic substance use.

    “While the presence of ongoing support is essential for long-term success in reintegration and recidivism reduction, the quality and meaningfulness of these connections is particularly influential in goals relating to problematic substance use (Lookatch et al., 2019).”

    From Reducing criminal recidivism in Alaska: The Set Free Model (2023) · cites this paper as Lookatch et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Baron RM, & Kenny DA (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173– 1182. 3806354
  2. Best D, Beckwith M, Haslam C, Alexander Haslam S, Jetten J, Mawson E, & Lubman DI (2016). Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: the social identity model of recovery (SIMOR). Addiction Research & Theory, 24(2), 111– 123.
  3. Bathish R, Best D, Savic M, Beckwith M, Mackenzie J, & Lubman DI (2017). “Is it me or should my friends take the credit?” The role of social networks and social identity in recovery from addiction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(1), 35– 46.
  4. Boisvert RA, Martin LM, Grosek M, & Clarie AJ (2008). Effectiveness of a peer-support community in addiction recovery: participation as intervention. Occupational Therapy International, 15(4), 205– 220. 18844242
  5. Booth BM, Russell DW, Soucek S, & Laughlin PR (1992). Social support and outcome of alcoholism treatment: An exploratory analysis. The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 18(1), 87– 101. 1562009
  6. Cavaiola AA, Fulmer BA, & Stout D (2015). The impact of social support and attachment style on quality of life and readiness to change in a sample of individuals receiving medication-assisted treatment for opioid dependence. Substance abuse, 36(2), 183– 191. 25839214
  7. Copello A, & Orford J (2002). Addiction and the family: is it time for services to take notice of the evidence? Addiction, 97(11), 1361– 1363. 12410776
  8. Covington S (2002). Helping women recover: Creating gender-responsive treatment In Straussner SLA & Brown S (Eds.) The handbook of addiction treatment for women: Theory and practice, 52– 72.
  9. Chakravorty S, Kuna ST, Zaharakis N, O’Brien CP, Kampman KM, & Oslin D (2010). Covariates of Craving in Actively Drinking Alcoholics. The American Journal on Addictions / American Academy of Psychiatrists in Alcoholism and Addictions, 19(5), 450– 457. 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2010.00067.x PMC2925315 20716308 · DOI
  10. Cox RB Jr, Ketner JS, & Blow AJ (2013). Working with couples and substance abuse: Recommendations for clinical practice. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 41(2), 160– 172.
  11. Day E, Copello A, Karia M, Roche J, Grewal P, George S, … & Chohan G (2013). Social network support for individuals receiving opiate substitution treatment and its association with treatment progress. European Addiction Research, 19(4), 211– 221. 23391965
  12. DiClemente CC, Schlundt D, & Gemmell L (2004). Readiness and stages of change in addiction treatment. The American Journal on Addictions, 13(2), 103– 119. 15204662
  13. Ehrman RN, & Robbins SJ (1994). Reliability and validity of 6-month timeline reports of cocaine and heroin use in a methadone population. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(4), 843– 50. 7962889
  14. El-Bassel N, Gilbert L, Wu E, Witte SS, Chang M, Hill J, & Remien RH (2011). Couple-based HIV prevention for low-income drug users from New York City: A randomized controlled trial to reduce dual risks. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 58(2), 198– 206. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318229eab1 21725249 PMC5870871 · DOI
  15. Ellis B, Bernichon T, Yu P, Roberts T, & Herrell JM (2004). Effect of social support on substance abuse relapse in a residential treatment setting for women. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27(2), 213– 221.
  16. Fals-Stewart W, O’Farrell TJ, Freitas TT, McFarlin SK, & Rutigliano P (2000). The timeline followback reports of psychoactive substance use by drug-abusing patients: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(1), 134– 44. 10710848
  17. Ghisletta P, & Spini D (2004). An introduction to generalized estimating equations and an application to assess selectivity effects in a longitudinal study on very old individuals. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(4), 421– 437.
  18. Gossop M, Stewart D, & Marsden J (2008). Attendance at Narcotics Anonymous and Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, frequency of attendance and substance use outcomes after residential treatment for drug dependence: a 5-year follow-up study. Addiction, 103(1), 119– 125. 18028521
  19. Greenfield BL, Owens MD, & Ley D (2014). Opioid use in Albuquerque, New Mexico: a needs assessment of recent changes and treatment availability. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 9(1), 10 10.1186/1940-0640-9-10 24942534 PMC4070335 · DOI
  20. Hall SM, Havassy BE, & Wasserman DA (1990). Commitment to abstinence and acute stress in relapse to alcohol, opiates, and nicotine. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 58(2), 175. 2335634
  21. Hall SM, Havassy BE, & Wasserman DA (1991). Effects of commitment to abstinence, positive moods, stress, and coping on relapse to cocaine use. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 59(4), 526. 1918556
  22. Harris J, Best D, Gossop M, Marshall J, Man LH, Manning V, & Strang J (2003). Prior Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) affiliation and the acceptability of the Twelve Steps to patients entering UK statutory addiction treatment. Journal of studies on alcohol, 64(2), 257– 261. 12713200
  23. Hser YI, Huang D, Teruya C, & Anglin MD (2003). Gender comparisons of drug abuse treatment outcomes and predictors. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 72(3), 255– 264. 14643942
  24. Humphreys K (1999). Professional interventions that facilitate 12-step self-help group involvement. Alcohol Research & Health, 23(2), 93– 93. 10890802 PMC6760425
  25. Kelly JF, Stout RL, Greene MC, & Slaymaker V (2014). Young adults, social networks, and addiction recovery: Post treatment changes in social ties and their role as a mediator of 12-step participation. PloS one, 9(6), e100121. 24945357 PMC4063778
  26. Kidorf, 1997 Kidorf M, Brooner RK, and King VL: Motivating methadone patients to include drug-free significant others in treatment: A behavioral intervention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1997; 14: pp. 23– 28 9218233
  27. Liddle HA (2004). Family-based therapies for adolescent alcohol and drug use: research contributions and future research needs. Addiction, 99(s2), 76– 92. 15488107
  28. Litt MD, Kadden RM, Kabela-Cormier E, & Petry NM (2009). Changing network support for drinking: network support project 2-year follow-up. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 77(2), 229. 19309183 PMC2661035
  29. Litt MD, Kadden RM, Tennen H & Kabela-Cormier E (2016). Network Support II: Randomized controlled trial of network support treatment and cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 77(2), 229. PMC4948060 27354234
  30. Longabaugh R, Wirtz PW, Zweben A, & Stout RL (1998). Network support for drinking, Alcoholics Anonymous and long-term matching effects. Addiction, 93(9), 1313– 1333. 9926538
  31. Maisto SA, Connors GJ, & Zywiak WH (2000). Alcohol treatment changes in coping skills, self-efficacy, and levels of alcohol use and related problems 1 year following treatment initiation. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14(3), 257. 10998951
  32. Mason WA, & Windle M (2002). Family, Religious, School, and Peer Influences on Adolescent Alcohol Use. Prevention Researcher, 9(3), 6– 7. 11271963
  33. McCrady BS (2004). To have but one true friend: implications for practice of research on alcohol use disorders and social network. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(2), 113. 15238053
  34. McKay JR, Alterman AI, McLellan AT, & Snider EC (1994). Treatment goals, continuity of care, and outcome in a day hospital program, (151), 254– 259. 8296899
  35. McKay JR, Van Horn DH, Oslin DW, Lynch KG, Ivey M, Ward K, … & Coviello DM (2010). A randomized trial of extended telephone-based continuing care for alcohol dependence: Within-treatment substance use outcomes. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 78(6), 912. 20873894 PMC3082847
  36. McKay JR, Van Horn D, Rennert L, Drapkin M, Ivey M, & Koppenhaver J (2013). Factors in sustained recovery from cocaine dependence. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 45(2), 163– 172. 23561331 PMC3696509
  37. McLellan A Thomas, Harvey Kushner, David Metzger, Roger Peters, Iris Smith, Grant Grissom, Helen Pettinati, and Milton Argeriou “ The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index.” Journal of substance abuse treatment 9, no. 3 (1992): 199– 213. 1334156
  38. Meyers RJ Villanueva M & Smith JE (2005). The community reinforcement approach: History and new directions. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 19(3), 247.
  39. Moos RH, & Moos BS (2006). Participation in treatment and Alcoholics Anonymous: A 16-year follow-up of initially untreated individuals. Journal of clinical psychology, 62(6), 735– 750. 16538654 PMC2220012
  40. Morgenstern J, & McKay JR (2007). Rethinking the paradigms that inform behavioral treatment research for substance use disorders. Addiction, 102(9), 1377– 1389. 17610541
  41. Polcin DL, & Korcha R (2017). Social support influences on substance abuse outcomes among sober living house residents with low and moderate psychiatric severity. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 61(1), 51– 70. 28757663 PMC5529042
  42. Prochaska JO, & DiClemente CC (1984). Self change processes, self efficacy and decisional balance across five stages of smoking cessation. Progress in clinical and biological research, 156, 131. 6473420
  43. Procidano ME, & Heller K (1983). Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: Three validation studies. American journal of community psychology, 11(1), 1– 24. 6837532
  44. Roberts A, Jackson MS, & Carlton-LaNey I (2000). Revisiting the need for feminism and afrocentric theory when treating African-American female substance abusers. Journal of Drug Issues, 30(4), 901– 917.
  45. Simmons J, & Singer M (2006). I love you … and heroin: Care and collusion among drug-using couples. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 1(1), 1– 13. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-1-7 PMC1524734 16722522 · DOI
  46. Smith DC, Davis JP, Ureche DJ, & Dumas TM (2016). Six month outcomes of a peer-enhanced community reinforcement approach for emerging adults with substance misuse: A Preliminary Study. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 61, 66– 73. 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.09.002 26482135 PMC4695312 · DOI
  47. Stout RL, Kelly JF, Magill M, & Pagano ME (2012). Association between social influences and drinking outcomes across three years. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73(3), 489– 497. 22456254 PMC3316719
  48. Timko C, & DeBenedetti A (2007). A randomized controlled trial of intensive referral to 12-step self-help groups: One-year outcomes. Drug and alcohol dependence, 90(2-3), 270– 279. 17524574
  49. Urberg KA, Değirmencioğlu SM, & Pilgrim C (1997). Close friend and group influence on adolescent cigarette smoking and alcohol use. Developmental psychology, 33(5), 834. 9300216
  50. Van Melick M, McCartney D, & Best D (2013). Ongoing recovery support and peer networks: A preliminary investigation of recovery peer supporters and their peers. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 8(3), 185– 199.
  51. Vanderplasschen W, Colpaert K, Autrique M, Rapp RC, Pearce S, Broekaert E, & Vandevelde S (2013). Therapeutic communities for addictions: a review of their effectiveness from a recovery-oriented perspective. The Scientific World Journal, 2013. PMC3562581 23401669
  52. Wasserman DA, Stewart AL, & Delucchi KL (2001). Social support and abstinence from opiates and cocaine during opioid maintenance treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 65(1), 65– 75. 11714591
  53. Wechsberg WM, El-Bassel N, Carney T, Browne FA, Myers B, & Zule WA (2015). Adapting an evidence-based HIV behavioral intervention for South African couples. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 10(6). doi: 10.1186/s13011-015-0005-6 PMC4344778 25888856 · DOI
  54. Weiss RD, Griffin ML, Gallop RJ, Najavits LM, Frank A, Crits-Christoph P, … & Luborsky L (2005). The effect of 12-step self-help group attendance and participation on drug use outcomes among cocaine-dependent patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 77(2), 177– 184. 15664719
  55. Weiss RD, Griffin ML, Najavits LM, Hufford C, Kogan J, Thompson HJ, … & Siqueland L (1996). Self-help activities in cocaine dependent patients entering treatment: Results from the NIDA collaborative cocaine treatment study. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 43(1), 79– 86. 8957146
  56. Windle M (1991). The difficult temperament in adolescence: Associations with substance use, family support, and problem behaviors. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47(2), 310– 315. 2030139
  57. Zywiak WH, Longabaugh R, & Wirtz PW (2002). Decomposing the relationships between pretreatment social network characteristics and alcohol treatment outcome. Journal of studies on alcohol, 63(1), 114– 121. 11925053

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Reducing criminal recidivism in Alaska: The Set Free Model

    Ray, R., & Madison, A. (2023) · Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being · doi:10.35502/jcswb.331

    “While the presence of ongoing support is essential for long-term success in reintegration and recidivism reduction, the quality and meaningfulness of these connections is particularly influential in goals relating to problematic substance use (Lookatch et al., 2019).”
    Background

Authors
Lookatch, S. J., Wimberly, A. S., & McKay, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Lookatch, Samantha J.
Venue
Substance Use & Misuse
Published
2019-07-19
Volume
54
Issue
13
Pages
2144-2155
ISSN
  • 1082-6084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2491
OpenAlex
W2963854287
Cited by
70
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Substance Use & Misuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIDA (R01, 0)
  • NIAAA
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
cocaine dependence, social support, 12-step programs, Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous, intensive outpatient treatment, continuing care, readiness to change, abstinence, family support, peer support, substance use disorder recovery
MeSH terms
Adult, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Social Support, Treatment Outcome, Cocaine-Related Disorders, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review