Cited by 115Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHomelessness and Social IssuesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Interpersonal factors and post‐treatment drinking and subjective wellbeing

BEATTIE, MARTHA C., LONGABAUGH, RICHARD·1997·Addiction

Abstract

Aims.A conceptual clarification of the domain of social relationships defines three aspects of social relationships (structure, function and quality), which have both alcohol‐specific and general components. We analyse the correlations among post‐treatment indicators of social relationships and the associations between these interpersonal variables and post‐treatment drinking and subjective wellbeing.Design.This is a secondary analysis of data from an alcohol treatment outcome study, in which subjects were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions and followed for 18 months.Setting.The outpatient treatment program is located within a private psychiatric hospital in the north‐eastern United States.Participants.We analyzed the 140 subjects who completed a social network instrument 12 months following treatment assignment.Intervention.This secondary analysis combined clients from three treatment conditions, all of which were based upon social learning theory.Measurements.Interview and questionnaire self‐report data were collected by trained interviewers.Findings.Indicators of social relationships are found to be relatively independent of one another. Only alcohol‐specific social relationship indicators are significantly associated with drinking outcomes, and only general indicators are significantly associated with subjective wellbeing. Functional indicators, addressing social interaction content, have stronger effects on outcomes than structural or quality indicators. General and alcohol‐specific support from friends have more influence than support from family; both surpass the influence of co‐workers.Conclusions A better understanding of the roles of social relationships during the course of treatment and recovery or relapse may help clarify how treatment personnel can utilize clients' interpersonal relationships more effectively to maximize treatment effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb02871.x

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BEATTIE, M. C., & LONGABAUGH, R.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-11
Volume
92
Issue
11
Pages
1507-1521
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2028388452
Cited by
115
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01aa005827-04, 7r01aa010450-05)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 AA05598, R01AA 05827, R01 AA10450)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
alcoholism, alcohol treatment outcomes, interpersonal relationships, interpersonal factors, subjective well-being, social network structure, social relationship quality, social support, family support, friend support, coworker support, relapse, social learning theory, outpatient care
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Ambulatory Care, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Social Support, United States, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review