Cited by 22Reading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and DisordersSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

The Role of Linguistic Diversity in the Prediction of Early Reading Comprehension: A Quantile Regression Approach

Open access
van den Bosch, Liza J., Segers, Eliane, Verhoeven, Ludo·2019·Scientific Studies of Reading

Abstract

Using classical and quantile regression analyses, we investigated whether predictor variables for early reading comprehension differed depending on language background and ability level in a mixed group of 161 monolingual (L1) and bilingual (L2) children in second grade (6–8 years). Although L2 readers scored lower on oral language skills and reading comprehension, the prediction of reading comprehension was similar for L1 and L2 readers. Classical regression identified decoding, vocabulary, and morphosyntactic knowledge as unique predictors with no interaction with language background. Quantile regression demonstrated that the prediction of reading comprehension differed across ability levels; decoding and morphosyntactic knowledge were consistently unique predictors, but vocabulary was uniquely related only for poor comprehenders and working memory only for good comprehenders. In both types of analysis, language background did not explain unique variance, indicating that individual differences in the predictor variables explained the L1–L2 performance gap in early reading comprehension across the ability range.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10888438.2018.1509864

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finding that lower contextual inferencing in L2 readers is due to lower linguistic ability confirms findings on other reading skills and is in line with findings on adult L2 learners.

    “This confirms findings on other reading skills (Lervåg & Aukrust, 2010;Raudszus et al., 2019;van den Bosch, Segers, & Verhoeven, 2018), and is in line with findings on adult L2 learners (Hamada, 2014;Mori & Nagy, 1999).”

    From Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2 (2021) · cites this paper as van den Bosch, Segers, & Verhoeven, 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cito, B. V. (2014). Begrijpend lezen 3.0 voor groep 4: M4-toets [Reading Comprehension 3.0 for second grade: M4 test]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito B.V. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  2. BF00401799 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Kort, W., Schittekatte, M., Dekker, P. H., Verhaeghe, P., Compaan, E. L., Bosmans, M., & Vermeir, G. (2005). WISC- III NL. Handleiding en Verantwoording. In D. Wechsler (Ed.), [Manual and Justification]. London, UK: The Psychological Corporation.
  4. Verhoeven, L. T. W., Keuning, J., Horsels, L., & Van Boxtel, H. (2013). Testinstrumentarium Taalontwikkelingsstoornissen T-TOS. In Cito B.V. (Ed.), [Set of Instruments Developmental Language Disorder]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van den Bosch, L. J., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L.
Affiliations
  • Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Scientific Studies of Reading
Published
2018-09-05
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
203-219
ISSN
  • 1088-8438 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-799X
OpenAlex
W2890168005
Cited by
22
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Studies of Reading (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
bilingual children, monolingual children, language background, decoding, vocabulary knowledge, morphosyntactic knowledge, working memory, speaking skills, second grade, quantile regression, ability level differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review