Cited by 24Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Law and WelfareConservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education

What Is the Future for Zoos and Aquariums?

Open access
Kagan, Ron, Allard, Stephanie, Carter, Scott·2018·Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science

Abstract

Animal welfare concerns have plagued the professional zoo and aquarium field for decades. Societal differences remain concerning the well-being of animals, but it appears a shift is emerging. Scientific studies of animal welfare have dramatically increased, establishing that many previous concerns were not misguided public empathy or anthropomorphism. As a result, both zoo and aquarium animal welfare policy and science are now at the center of attention within the world's professional zoos and aquariums. It is now possible to view a future that embraces the well-being of individual captive exotic animals, as well as that of their species, and one in which professional zoos and aquariums are dedicated equally to advancing both. Though the ethics of keeping exotic animals and animals from the wild in captivity are still a contentious subject both outside and even within the profession, this study argues. We argue that this path forward will substantially improve most zoo and aquarium animals' welfare and could significantly reduce societal concerns. If animal welfare science and policy are strongly rooted in compassion and embedded in robust accreditation systems, the basic zoo/aquarium paradigm will move toward a more thoughtful approach to the interface between visitors and animals. It starts with a fundamental commitment to the welfare of individual animals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10888705.2018.1514302

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kagan et al. (2018) concluded that zoos and aquaria often pose a reluctance in publishing gaps in zoo science as it could be considered as a 'failure' within that collection due to public pressures, indicating a limitation on MSE published literature.

    “Kagan et al., (2018) concluded that zoos and aquaria often pose a reluctance in publishing gaps in zoo science as it could be considered as a 'failure' within that collection due to public pressures, indicating a limitation on MSE published literature.”

    From An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria (2022) · cites this paper as Kagan et al., (2018)

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Campbell-Palmer, R., & Rosell, F. (2017). olfactory behavior in zoo animals. In B. L. Nielsen (Ed.), Olfaction in animal behaviour and welfare (pp. 176–188). Boston, MA: CABI.
  2. Carter, S., & Kagan, R. (2010). Management of ‘surplus’ animals. In D. G. Kleinman, K. V. Thompson, & C. Kirk Baer (Eds.), Wild mammals in captivity: Principles and techniques for zoo management (2nd ed., pp. 263–267). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Cheney, D., & Seyfarth, R. (1992). How monkeys see the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Gruen, L. (2014). Dignity, captivity, and an ethics of sight. In L. Gruen (Ed.), The ehics of captivity (pp. 231–247). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  5. Hosey, G., Melfi, V., Formella, I., Ward, S. J., Tokarski, M., Brunger, D., … Hill, S. P. (2016). Is wounding aggression in zoo-housed chimpanzees and ring tailed lemurs related to zoo visitor numbers? Zoo Biology, 35(3), 205–209.
  6. Kagan, R. (2017). Sanctuaries: Zoos of the future. In J. Donahue (Ed.), Increasing legal rights for zoo animals: Justice on the ark (pp. 140–150). Lanham, Md: Lexington Books.
  7. Kagan, R., Carter, S., & Allard, S. (2015). A universal framework for exotic animal welfare. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 18(Suppl 1), S1–S10.
  8. Kagan, R., & Veasey, J. (2010). Challenges of zoo animal welfare. In D. G. Kleinman, K. V. Thompson, & C. Kirk Baer (Eds.), Wild mammals in captivity: Principles and techniques for zoo management (2nd ed., pp. 11–21). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  9. Malamud, R. (1998). Reading zoos: Representations of animals and captivity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Morgan, K. N., & Tromborg, C. T. (2007). Sources of stress in captivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102(3–4), 262–302.
  11. Orban, D. A., Soltis, J., Perkins, L., & Mellen, J. D. (2017). Sound at the zoo: Using animal monitoring, sound measurement, and noise reduction in zoo animal management. Zoo Biology, 36(3), 231–236.
  12. Young, T., Finegan, E., & Brown, R. D. (2013). Effects of summer microclimates on behavior of lions and tigers in zoos. International Journal of Biometeorology, 57(3), 381–390.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kagan, R., Allard, S., & Carter, S.
Affiliations
Detroit Zoological Society, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
Corresponding author
Kagan, Ron
Venue
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
Published
2018-08-31
Volume
21
Issue
sup1
Pages
59-70
ISSN
  • 1088-8705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7604
OpenAlex
W2896166388
Cited by
24
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Keywords
zoos, aquariums, animal welfare, animal welfare policy, accreditation, anthropomorphism
MeSH terms
Accreditation, Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Conservation of Natural Resources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review