Cited by 23Communication and COVID-19 ImpactMisinformation and Its ImpactsPublic Relations and Crisis Communication

Reliability and trust perception of users on social media posts related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic

Tayal, Pulkit, Bharathi. S, Vijayakumar·2021·Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment

Abstract

The study examined the different parameters to determine the reliability and trust perception of users on the social media posts about COVID-19. Responses were collected from randomly selected social media users using structured close-ended questions. The study examined the underpinned hypothesis by the Goffman’s theory and Bourdieu’s theory. Hypothesis testing was done using Chi-square test to analyze the different parameters, to test the reliability and trust perception of users on social media posts. Our analysis showed that the parameters such as source authenticity, cross-checking of information, real-time news etc were not dependent on frequency of use of social media by respondents. It was found that most of the social media posts about COVID-19 were not so reliable and trustworthy. However, social media posts which are shared by competent persons such as doctors, medical practitioners etc. were trusted by the people. We believe our research will be beneficial in understanding the perception of users toward social media in case of a disease outbreak such as COVID-19.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10911359.2020.1825254

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The timeliness of information has no significant effect on information trust in the context of COVID-19 information behaviors on social media.

    “However, one study focused on COVID-19 information behaviors on social media found that the timeliness of information had no signifcant efect on information trust [104].”
  • Although timely information positively influences people's trust in information from social media, the timeliness of a social media post had no significant effect on people's trust in that post during COVID-19.

    “Additionally, our review has also shown that although timely information positively infuences people's trust in information from social media, this timeliness of a social media post had no signifcant efect on people's trust in that post during COVID-19 [104].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tayal, P., & Bharathi. S, V.
Affiliations
  • Symbiosis International University (IN)
  • Symbiosis International (Deemed University)
Corresponding author
Tayal, Pulkit
Venue
Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment
Published
2021-01-04
Volume
31
Issue
1-4
Pages
325-339
ISSN
  • 1091-1359 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-3556
OpenAlex
W3119223550
Cited by
23
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, social media, information reliability, trust perception, authenticity of sources, real-time news, health information, outbreak, social media use frequency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review