PreprintCited by 1,297Memory Processes and InfluencesMisinformation and Its ImpactsDeception detection and forensic psychology

Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory: Figure 1.

Open access
Loftus, Elizabeth F.·2005·Learning & Memory

Abstract

The misinformation effect refers to the impairment in memory for the past that arises after exposure to misleading information. The phenomenon has been investigated for at least 30 years, as investigators have addressed a number of issues. These include the conditions under which people are especially susceptible to the negative impact of misinformation, and conversely when are they resistant. Warnings about the potential for misinformation sometimes work to inhibit its damaging effects, but only under limited circumstances. The misinformation effect has been observed in a variety of human and nonhuman species. And some groups of individuals are more susceptible than others. At a more theoretical level, investigators have explored the fate of the original memory traces after exposure to misinformation appears to have made them inaccessible. This review of the field ends with a brief discussion of the newer work involving misinformation that has explored the processes by which people come to believe falsely that they experienced rich complex events that never, in fact, occurred.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.94705

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals can be relatively easily tricked into believing that fictitious events have actually taken place.

    “Given that several decades of empirical research have impressively demonstrated that individuals can be relatively easily tricked into believing that fictitious events have actually taken place (cf.Loftus, 2005), the possibility to willingly fake our personal past using digital technologies offers a worrying outlook into the future.”
  • The memory distortion effects we observed here in some ways resemble those that occur in the postevent misinformation paradigm.

    “The memory distortion effects we observed here in some ways resemble those that occur in the postevent misinformation paradigm (2), in which erroneous information presented after encoding contributes to later false memories because of source-memory confusion.”
  • Memory is not an exact reproduction of past experiences but a constructive process subject to errors and distortions.

    “Research in psychology and neuroscience supports the idea that memory is not an exact reproduction of past experiences, but is instead a constructive process subject to a variety of errors and distortions (1–8).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ost, J., Foster, S., Costall, A., and Bull, R. 2005. False reports in appropriate interviews. Memory (in press).
  2. M.L. Commons, A.R. Wagner, and R.J. Herrnstein), Vol. 4, Discrimination processes. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loftus, E. F.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Loftus, Elizabeth F.
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2005-07
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
361-366
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2073166664
Cited by
1,297
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 48
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
misinformation effect, memory malleability, false memory, misleading information, memory distortion, misinformation resistance, non-human species, memory traces
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Memory, Repression, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review