Cited by 128Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Biogas production from anaerobic digestion of food waste and relevant air quality implications

Open access
Kuo, Jeff, Dow, Jason·2017·Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association

Abstract

Biopower can diversify energy supply and improve energy resiliency. Increases in biopower production from sustainable biomass can provide many economic and environmental benefits. For example, increasing biogas production through anaerobic digestion of food waste would increase the use of renewable fuels throughout California and add to its renewables portfolio. Although a biopower project will produce renewable energy, the process of producing bioenergy should harmonize with the goal of protecting public health. Meeting air emission requirements is paramount to the successful implementation of any biopower project. A case study was conducted by collecting field data from a wastewater treatment plant that employs anaerobic codigestion of fats, oils, and grease (FOG), food waste, and wastewater sludge, and also uses an internal combustion (IC) engine to generate biopower using the biogas. This research project generated scientific information on (a) quality and quantity of biogas from anaerobic codigestion of food waste and municipal wastewater sludge, (b) levels of contaminants in raw biogas that may affect beneficial uses of the biogas, (c) removal of the contaminants by the biogas conditioning systems, (d) emissions of NOx, SO2, CO, CO2, and methane, and (e) types and levels of air toxics present in the exhausts of the IC engine fueled by the biogas. The information is valuable to those who consider similar operations (i.e., co-digestion of food waste with municipal wastewater sludge and power generation using the produced biogas) and to support rulemaking decisions with regards to air quality issues for such applications.Implications: Full-scale operation of anaerobic codigestion of food waste with municipal sludge is viable, but it is still new. There is a lack of readily available scientific information on the quality of raw biogas, as well as on potential emissions from power generation using this biogas. This research developed scientific information with regard to quality and quantity of biogas from anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and municipal wastewater sludge, as well as impacts on air quality from biopower generation using this biogas. The need and performance of conditioning/pretreatment systems for biopower generation were also assessed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10962247.2017.1316326

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The yield of methane from anaerobic digestion of one ton of food waste can be as high as 90.6 m3.

    “The yield of methane from the anaerobic digestion of one ton of food waste can be as high as 90.6 m3 [36].”

    From Food Waste Biorefinery: Pathway towards Circular Bioeconomy (2021) · cites this paper as [36]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Drake, N. 2011. CA regulatory arena for dairy based anaero- bic digesters. US EPA 6th Annual AgStar Conference, Boise, ID, May 10-12. http://www.epa.gov/agstar/docu ments/conf11/drake.pdf
  2. Kraemer, T. 2012. Juicing the low-hanging fruit: Anaerobic diges- tion and energy production from MSW Organics in North America. Presentation at SWANA Evergreen Chapter, May 18. http://www.swananw.org/documents/SWANA% 20Presentations/2012-05-18_02-Kraemer_Presentation.pdf
  3. Razbani, O., N. Mirzamohammad, and M. Assadi. 2011. Literature review and road map for using biogas in internal combustion engines. Third International Conference on Applied Energy, May 16-18, Perugia, Italy, http://www. cense.no/getfile.php/CenSE/Applied%20energy%20paper% 2001.pdf
  4. Warner, D. 2009. Permitting issues for anaerobic digesters in the San Joaquin Valley. California Energy Commission Workshop on Biopower in California, April 21. http:// www.energy.ca.gov/2009_energypolicy/documents/2009- 04-21_workshop/presentations/06-San_Joaquin_Air_ District_Presentation.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuo, J., & Dow, J.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Fullerton (US)
  • Central Marin Sanitation Agency, San Rafael, CA, USA
Corresponding author
Kuo, Jeff
Venue
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
Published
2017-06-22
Volume
67
Issue
9
Pages
1000-1011
ISSN
  • 1047-3289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-2247
  • 2162-2906
OpenAlex
W2612816752
Cited by
128
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
9.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
California Energy Commission (CEC 500-11-030)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Keywords
biogas production, co-digestion, food waste, sewage sludge, biopower, hazardous air pollutants, NOx emissions, methane emissions, air pollution regulation, renewable energy
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Anaerobiosis, California, Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide, Food, Methane, Nitrogen Oxides, Sewage, Sulfur Dioxide, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Waste Products, Bioreactors, Biofuels, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review