Cited by 102Big Data and Business IntelligenceBig Data Technologies and ApplicationsCorporate Governance and Management

An analytical journey towards big data

Phillips-Wren, Gloria, Hoskisson, Angela·2015·Journal of Decision Systems

Abstract

Companies are realising the potential value of data to gain insight into their customers and the power of analytics to guide decision-making. While many firms have invested in data-intensive customer relationship management (CRM) systems to develop long-term relationships with customers, the advent of ‘big data’ has led to even more challenges as companies struggle to both develop analytical capabilities for existing data and integrate information from these new data sources into their CRM decisions. In this paper, we employ a case study approach to identify management challenges in creating a data-driven organisation that has aspirations to incorporate big data into decision-making. The firm is an international franchiser in the hospitality industry with a centralised CRM team and well-known brands. Management challenges are identified through elite interviews and are associated with a customer dimension, CRM process dimension, organisational alignment dimension, and CRM outputs dimension. An experiment with sentiment analysis of customer social media data is performed to illustrate the unique barriers to integrating unstructured data as one form of big data into the firm’s current decision-making paradigm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/12460125.2015.994333

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another challenge is the shortage of people with analytical skills to interpret data.

    “Another challenge is the shortage of people with analytical skills to interpret data (Phillips-Wren & Hoskisson, 2015).”

    From Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods (2017) · cites this paper as Phillips-Wren & Hoskisson, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phillips-Wren, G., & Hoskisson, A.
Affiliations
Loyola University Maryland (US)
Corresponding author
Phillips-Wren, Gloria
Venue
Journal of Decision Systems
Published
2015-01-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
87-102
ISSN
  • 1246-0125 (ISSN-L)
  • 2116-7052
OpenAlex
W2032229569
Cited by
102
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
19.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Decision System (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
Keywords
big data, customer relationship management, data-driven decision making, management problems, unstructured data, social media data, sentiment analysis, organizational alignment, data integration, analytics capability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review