Cited by 81Digital Marketing and Social MediaDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchExpert finding and Q&A systems

Personal profile information as cues of credibility in online travel reviews

Park, Heelye, Xiang, Zheng, Josiam, Bharath, Kim, Haejung·2014·Anatolia

Abstract

Given the importance of traveller reviews as sources of travel-related information, source credibility is becoming an increasingly crucial issue in terms of research and application. This study examines the role of self-disclosed personal profile information (PPI) as cues of source credibility in the context of travellers' use of online reviews for trip planning purposes. The results show that the perceived congruence between PPI, i.e. reviewer location and travel interest, and the textual content of the review influences subjects' judgements of the reviewer's credibility. The findings suggest that the reviewer's self-disclosed PPI serves as credibility cues for travellers' assessments of travel reviewers. The implications of the study, as well as directions for future research, are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13032917.2013.820203

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, H., Xiang, Z., Josiam, B., & Kim, H.
Affiliations
  • University of North Texas (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Xiang, Zheng
Venue
Anatolia
Published
2013-09-05
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
13-23
ISSN
  • 1303-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 2156-6909
OpenAlex
W2070784226
Cited by
81
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Anatolia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Expert finding and Q&A systems
Keywords
source credibility, online travel reviews, credibility cues, travel interest, trip planning, consumer search

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review